![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OK, this is generally some very nice work; it's a shame that we're unlikely to get any pictures to illustrate it for another 60 years...
Some comments:
But overall this is very good work. Thank you!-- Robert Merkel 02:12, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Tried to make the assessment more npov, so far as I understand the policy. Unfortunately I have no idea what Robert Hughes might have had to say, so I've quoted Lou Klepac. The difficulty is that if you do nothing but quote the assessments of critics, no matter how eminant, the piece becomes wooden. (X says this, Y says that, etc). Anyway, the second para of the assessment is now the Klepac quote. The first is a distillation of my reading on Drysdale - my own words, but what I believe would be generally accepted (and after all, Drysdale isn't a controversial figure, just a largely ignored one). PiCo 03:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Image:Drysdale.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Russell Drysdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.griffithreview.com/images/stories/edition_articles/ed19_pdfs/wallace_ed19.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OK, this is generally some very nice work; it's a shame that we're unlikely to get any pictures to illustrate it for another 60 years...
Some comments:
But overall this is very good work. Thank you!-- Robert Merkel 02:12, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Tried to make the assessment more npov, so far as I understand the policy. Unfortunately I have no idea what Robert Hughes might have had to say, so I've quoted Lou Klepac. The difficulty is that if you do nothing but quote the assessments of critics, no matter how eminant, the piece becomes wooden. (X says this, Y says that, etc). Anyway, the second para of the assessment is now the Klepac quote. The first is a distillation of my reading on Drysdale - my own words, but what I believe would be generally accepted (and after all, Drysdale isn't a controversial figure, just a largely ignored one). PiCo 03:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Image:Drysdale.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Russell Drysdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.griffithreview.com/images/stories/edition_articles/ed19_pdfs/wallace_ed19.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)