This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Ethics

Consensus of VfD on 7 March 2005 to keep. Discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rushworth Kidder. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 20:53, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

After getting suspicious and googling Wikipedia for Kidder references, there seem to be a number of very similarly worded references subtly inserted into a wide variety of ethics-related Wikipedia articles. The ideas associated with Kidder are not sufficiently ground-breaking to warrant this level of attention from Wikipedia. I've removed a few of the references. If anyone thinks that Kidder really is notable, perhaps they could comment below. Thanks. Caravaca 11:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC) reply

He's dead now so I guess that has bounced up his notability a bit? Certainly reduces the changes of vanity page edits! 109.79.58.81 ( talk) 21:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC) reply