GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MSG17 ( talk · contribs) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA-worthiness as part of the
Jan 2022 backlog drive. I was really surprised to see that no one had taken up this review until now. I have read the article previously and found it to be rather interesting and informative, but now I will check it against the
good article criteria. I don't forsee many major issues, but let's get started!
their similar themes and use of honey is "by-product of our times"add '[a]' or 'the' to the start of the quote
that in the Renaissance or Victorian periods - Kaur attributing their namesakesreplace " - " with emdash
– although her father refused her to pursue it in educationthat's kinda awkward, maybe something like
;however, her father prohibited her from studying the subject in university. Another approach would be to split it from the line about her music studies and merge it with her other aspirations.
– that Kaur later inferred as a result of wishing to preserve their orginal culturedon't think the dash is needed, since inferred is used right after I think "realized/interpreted was a result" would be better, "orginal" -> "original"
Carl Wilson and Khaira-Hanks, argued that her mainstream success and personal identity contributed towards people disregarding her work.no need for comma
literature scholar, Lili Pâquetno comma needed
One last lookover...
When studying poetry she'd "agonize over each and every word", "I would have to pull out...replace comma with colon
In general, I do find your use of dashes a bit different form what I am accustomed to - there would be a lot of instances I would use commas and semicolons instead. Looking at your previous work, this seems like a style that I don't know about rather than something that is "wrong". It's nice to learn new things! Anyway, these comments should be the last on prose and MOS.
No edit warring or drastic daily changes, just minor additions. Passed.
Given how polarized reception is for Kaur's work and the amount of discussion about why that is so, covering her neutrally is no small feat. SO far, it looks like it offers a good look into the different perspectives of audiences and critics on Kaur, but I will look more at this aspect later.
After looking at this again, I think the article has done a fantastic job showing the difference between critical and audience reception and the different views of her work. Passed. MSG17 ( talk) 02:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Scope wise, I think this covers as many relevant details and aspects of Kaur and her work as possible without becoming too minute or unnecessarily focused on certain aspects. Passed.
Well, I gotta hand it to you, this was great work as a comprehensive and encyclopediac dive into a rather popular and divisive poet. I have no skill with the art, unfornuately; if I did, I would come up with a clever end to this review. But it still speaks to the accessibility the article had to laypeople, much like Kaur's work. Now, I deem this article promoted to GA, congrats! MSG17 ( talk) 03:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MSG17 ( talk · contribs) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA-worthiness as part of the
Jan 2022 backlog drive. I was really surprised to see that no one had taken up this review until now. I have read the article previously and found it to be rather interesting and informative, but now I will check it against the
good article criteria. I don't forsee many major issues, but let's get started!
their similar themes and use of honey is "by-product of our times"add '[a]' or 'the' to the start of the quote
that in the Renaissance or Victorian periods - Kaur attributing their namesakesreplace " - " with emdash
– although her father refused her to pursue it in educationthat's kinda awkward, maybe something like
;however, her father prohibited her from studying the subject in university. Another approach would be to split it from the line about her music studies and merge it with her other aspirations.
– that Kaur later inferred as a result of wishing to preserve their orginal culturedon't think the dash is needed, since inferred is used right after I think "realized/interpreted was a result" would be better, "orginal" -> "original"
Carl Wilson and Khaira-Hanks, argued that her mainstream success and personal identity contributed towards people disregarding her work.no need for comma
literature scholar, Lili Pâquetno comma needed
One last lookover...
When studying poetry she'd "agonize over each and every word", "I would have to pull out...replace comma with colon
In general, I do find your use of dashes a bit different form what I am accustomed to - there would be a lot of instances I would use commas and semicolons instead. Looking at your previous work, this seems like a style that I don't know about rather than something that is "wrong". It's nice to learn new things! Anyway, these comments should be the last on prose and MOS.
No edit warring or drastic daily changes, just minor additions. Passed.
Given how polarized reception is for Kaur's work and the amount of discussion about why that is so, covering her neutrally is no small feat. SO far, it looks like it offers a good look into the different perspectives of audiences and critics on Kaur, but I will look more at this aspect later.
After looking at this again, I think the article has done a fantastic job showing the difference between critical and audience reception and the different views of her work. Passed. MSG17 ( talk) 02:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Scope wise, I think this covers as many relevant details and aspects of Kaur and her work as possible without becoming too minute or unnecessarily focused on certain aspects. Passed.
Well, I gotta hand it to you, this was great work as a comprehensive and encyclopediac dive into a rather popular and divisive poet. I have no skill with the art, unfornuately; if I did, I would come up with a clever end to this review. But it still speaks to the accessibility the article had to laypeople, much like Kaur's work. Now, I deem this article promoted to GA, congrats! MSG17 ( talk) 03:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|