This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this article basically saying that strictly speaking, France and USA are dictatorships? -- Rebroad 19:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I've removed some of the piece dealing with rule with decree in Venezuela as it states that Chavez is going to shut down opposition television. This needs to be referenced and as I've been looking on reputible news channels I can't see this anywhere. Probably the nasty Republicans at work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.201.220 ( talk) 11:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
With all due to respect to Giorgio Agamben, this article seems to be more about what Giorgio Agamben has to say about rule by decree rather than about what rule by decree is, was, etc. -- 68.230.152.36 17:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I wonder if this Giorgio Agamben is an author of Wikipedia...
India was ruled by Indira under emergency, allowed by the president of India, to rule by decree. Can this information be added?
When this happened, I heard on on somewhere (I think it was BBC) that in fact rule by decree powers are fairly common in Venezuelan recent history. If true, the article needs to be updated since the way it is now may mislead people to think this is a somewhat unusual move Nil Einne 14:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed the reference to opposition TV. The BBC reference supports the idea that he wants to shut down the opposition TV but it's not 100% clear if his action requires his rule by decree power. Definitely it wasn't one of the thing's he said he wanted to do as the article appeared to suggest to me. If someone can find a reliable source which says it will require his rule by decree power then your welcome to re-include but otherwise it should be left out. In any case, this isn't the article to go into too much depth as to what Chavez does and doesn't do with his rule by decree power. [1] Nil Einne 14:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
In the section on the 1933 German decree, it says The most prominent example in history..., but this seems like a bold statement to make in an encyclopedic entry. I am not a student of history, and perhaps historians are generally in agreement that this is the "most prominent", but I suspect that this depends on where you live. SJFriedl ( talk) 15:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The use of décrets-loi in France was quite extensive during the Third and Fourth Republics. Perhaps it should have its own article, or at least a section here. There's quite a bit about it at fr:Décret-loi that perhaps someone with better French could translate. -- Delirium ( talk) 05:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Not done
I'm proposing that Enabling act be merged here. Now I'm actually not quite sure if a merge should be done, but I am sure that there's a lot of overlap here and the relationship between these two closely related topics needs sorting out. A merge might help that, or else a merge discussion might encourage someone to sort it out so a merge isn't necessary. If a merge happens, an unmerge in WP:SUMMARY style might make sense at some point in the future when the topic is more fully developed. Rd232 talk 13:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Typos, grammatical errors, possible biased language 71.163.81.143 ( talk) 23:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this article basically saying that strictly speaking, France and USA are dictatorships? -- Rebroad 19:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I've removed some of the piece dealing with rule with decree in Venezuela as it states that Chavez is going to shut down opposition television. This needs to be referenced and as I've been looking on reputible news channels I can't see this anywhere. Probably the nasty Republicans at work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.201.220 ( talk) 11:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
With all due to respect to Giorgio Agamben, this article seems to be more about what Giorgio Agamben has to say about rule by decree rather than about what rule by decree is, was, etc. -- 68.230.152.36 17:37, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I wonder if this Giorgio Agamben is an author of Wikipedia...
India was ruled by Indira under emergency, allowed by the president of India, to rule by decree. Can this information be added?
When this happened, I heard on on somewhere (I think it was BBC) that in fact rule by decree powers are fairly common in Venezuelan recent history. If true, the article needs to be updated since the way it is now may mislead people to think this is a somewhat unusual move Nil Einne 14:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed the reference to opposition TV. The BBC reference supports the idea that he wants to shut down the opposition TV but it's not 100% clear if his action requires his rule by decree power. Definitely it wasn't one of the thing's he said he wanted to do as the article appeared to suggest to me. If someone can find a reliable source which says it will require his rule by decree power then your welcome to re-include but otherwise it should be left out. In any case, this isn't the article to go into too much depth as to what Chavez does and doesn't do with his rule by decree power. [1] Nil Einne 14:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
In the section on the 1933 German decree, it says The most prominent example in history..., but this seems like a bold statement to make in an encyclopedic entry. I am not a student of history, and perhaps historians are generally in agreement that this is the "most prominent", but I suspect that this depends on where you live. SJFriedl ( talk) 15:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The use of décrets-loi in France was quite extensive during the Third and Fourth Republics. Perhaps it should have its own article, or at least a section here. There's quite a bit about it at fr:Décret-loi that perhaps someone with better French could translate. -- Delirium ( talk) 05:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Not done
I'm proposing that Enabling act be merged here. Now I'm actually not quite sure if a merge should be done, but I am sure that there's a lot of overlap here and the relationship between these two closely related topics needs sorting out. A merge might help that, or else a merge discussion might encourage someone to sort it out so a merge isn't necessary. If a merge happens, an unmerge in WP:SUMMARY style might make sense at some point in the future when the topic is more fully developed. Rd232 talk 13:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Typos, grammatical errors, possible biased language 71.163.81.143 ( talk) 23:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)