This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

@ 20204622hkus: Hi. In fact, the discourse used by its opponents cannot be cited by reference sources, and furthermore even much of the above discourse cannot be supported by reference sources. One of the big reasons I didn't initially translate this list to the English Wikipedia was because it was confusing. I will remove the ones that can't be proven in Fu's source. ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 14:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

can I put Chinese refs? 20204622hkus ( talk) 14:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 20204622hkus: Of course yes, but you can actually find very little in the Chinese literature that specifically supports these claims either. ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

why it calls "breakthrough studies"? 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 20204622hkus: It is the literal translation used by the New York Times ( [1]), other literal translations include "passology" (used by Dissent, [2]), "breakthrough school" (used by the Financial Times, [3]) and even "replacement theory" ( [4]). ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

those aren't literal translation at all. 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

erroneous translations. 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 20204622hkus: Well they actually are. For example, " Geremie R. Barmé, a Sinologist in New Zealand who has followed the rise of 'breakthrough studies' — ruguanxue in Chinese — says the historical comparisons reflect anxiety 'about China's great nation status and its place in the world.'" (transcribed from the NYT) And, "Though their comments are frequently deleted, critics of ruguanxue (pass-ology) do sometimes appear on social media. Some embrace the philosophy of jiasu zhuyi (accelerationism), according to which the overreach of the party will lead to its collapse." (from Dissent) ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

literal but not literal. ok. I don't care. 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

thanks for the refs you gave. 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

You're welcome. ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 20204622hkus: It seems that "Entering the strategic pass-logy" should be "Entering the pass-logy", so maybe passology is instead would be the best? ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply

maybe, at least it has a "Pass" (half of the 关) inside. 20204622hkus ( talk) 15:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC) reply