This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would it be okay if I would have the permission to include the following line?
...But, since a synonym of this genus is "Lorenzinities" , there might be three species because there exists a species called Lorenzinites rarus , which is though to actually be a cnidarian , or either a misshapen fossil specimen of a rugoconites"
I am including this line because I want to also say that Lorenzinities is a synonym for the genus , and that the species L. rarus is part of the Lorenzinities group , but , doesn't share any similarities with both R. enigmaticus or R. tenuirugosus. And that it might actually be a Cnidarian Rugoconites Tenuirugosus ( talk) 09:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would it be okay if I would have the permission to include the following line?
...But, since a synonym of this genus is "Lorenzinities" , there might be three species because there exists a species called Lorenzinites rarus , which is though to actually be a cnidarian , or either a misshapen fossil specimen of a rugoconites"
I am including this line because I want to also say that Lorenzinities is a synonym for the genus , and that the species L. rarus is part of the Lorenzinities group , but , doesn't share any similarities with both R. enigmaticus or R. tenuirugosus. And that it might actually be a Cnidarian Rugoconites Tenuirugosus ( talk) 09:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosus