This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. This article has had a peer review which is now archived. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Rudolf Haag ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 18 March 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

We need an article on Haag's theorem. Unfortunately I am not equipped to write it. Xxanthippe ( talk) 02:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC). reply

I was one of the people in charge of reviewing Rudolf Haag's German Wikipedia article ( see the original discussion). We had made substantial additions to the original version and we had recognized Haag's contributions according to their scientific weight. We had also replaced the picture by a newer photo.

I have ported these major changes to the English article. I thank Johnnyblade86 for his help in reviewing the text. -- SimoneD89 ( talk) 05:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC) reply