From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess the other one should be deleted, since it has no content and this one does.

Also, ruck vs ruckman? Google shows the terms are about equally frequent. I think Ruck should be used as a gender neutral term. I even have a nice picture of rucks, but they're certainly not men. :)

cheers -- pfctdayelise ( translate?) 12:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I agree with your discussion and arguement, although I think that it is better if the two pages be merged. Thoughts anyone?-- Alza08 ( talk) 08:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply

There was no referenced content in Ruck (Australian rules football) and therefore nothing mergable, so I just turned it into a redirect. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move 2 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Elli ( talk | contribs) 15:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC) reply


Ruckman (Australian rules football)Ruck (Australian rules football) – Gender neutral term appropriate with MOS:GNL, having the professional AFL Women's competition and general use is moving towards "ruck". Also in the article, the lede begins "ruckman or ruckwoman" and the article title should reflect that. SuperJew ( talk) 11:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess the other one should be deleted, since it has no content and this one does.

Also, ruck vs ruckman? Google shows the terms are about equally frequent. I think Ruck should be used as a gender neutral term. I even have a nice picture of rucks, but they're certainly not men. :)

cheers -- pfctdayelise ( translate?) 12:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I agree with your discussion and arguement, although I think that it is better if the two pages be merged. Thoughts anyone?-- Alza08 ( talk) 08:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply

There was no referenced content in Ruck (Australian rules football) and therefore nothing mergable, so I just turned it into a redirect. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Requested move 2 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Elli ( talk | contribs) 15:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC) reply


Ruckman (Australian rules football)Ruck (Australian rules football) – Gender neutral term appropriate with MOS:GNL, having the professional AFL Women's competition and general use is moving towards "ruck". Also in the article, the lede begins "ruckman or ruckwoman" and the article title should reflect that. SuperJew ( talk) 11:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook