This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Worcestershire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. West Midlands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Birmingham Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be called Rubery rather than Rubery Village.

Agreed, having spent my teenage years in Rubery, I can't remember it being referred to as Rubery Village. The town is identified simply as Rubery. Marcuss63 09:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Okay. How can we change the title of the article?

Go to WP:RM and follow the instructions. BTW, please remember to sign and date your posts with 4 tildes (as above). HeartofaDog 12:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply