This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Royal Rumble (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Royal Rumble (2005) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
In both the 1991 and 1994 Royal Rumbles, an entrant for one reason or another didn't make it to the ring. This should be mentioned in the trivia section.
Normally, aren't the qualification matches for the royal rumble listed somewhere, or were there none in 2005? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Dagon ( talk • contribs)
Rare nowadays, probably. Because in 2004 there were either 9 or 11 ones listed....but thanks...-- Lord Dagon ( talk) 20:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Just listened to a podcast with Batista where he says the ending was botched and that him and Cena being eliminated was not meant to happen [1]. Should this be added to the results ? Bencey ( talk) 20:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The newsletter indicated that this article was up for peer review, but I must have missed it because the newsletter was delayed for a long while. Anyway, I have a couple of suggestions for improving the article:
Other than that, looks good. Nikki 311 00:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Once everything is done, give your one week notice to WP:PW. iMat thew 20 08 11:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Royal Rumble (2005)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Results":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Royal Rumble (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Royal Rumble (2005) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
In both the 1991 and 1994 Royal Rumbles, an entrant for one reason or another didn't make it to the ring. This should be mentioned in the trivia section.
Normally, aren't the qualification matches for the royal rumble listed somewhere, or were there none in 2005? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Dagon ( talk • contribs)
Rare nowadays, probably. Because in 2004 there were either 9 or 11 ones listed....but thanks...-- Lord Dagon ( talk) 20:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Just listened to a podcast with Batista where he says the ending was botched and that him and Cena being eliminated was not meant to happen [1]. Should this be added to the results ? Bencey ( talk) 20:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The newsletter indicated that this article was up for peer review, but I must have missed it because the newsletter was delayed for a long while. Anyway, I have a couple of suggestions for improving the article:
Other than that, looks good. Nikki 311 00:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Once everything is done, give your one week notice to WP:PW. iMat thew 20 08 11:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Royal Rumble (2005)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Results":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)