This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
An image used in this article,
File:Royal-Princess-Princess2013-.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Royal Princess (2013). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The article said the ship was en route to "Whittier", which I have assumed means Whittier, Alaska, but the cited source says it was en route to Anchorage. Which is correct? Both of them apparently have a suitable port with cruise ship facilities. — BarrelProof ( talk) 19:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Royal Princess (2012) be
renamed and moved to
Royal Princess.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
Royal Princess (2012) → Royal Princess – the two ships on List of ships named Royal Princess, resembling with the same name is now irrelevant since they're now have been renamed and now aren't called Royal Princess. 49.149.110.214 ( talk) 02:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The article List of ships named Royal Princess is a set index and therefore a list article and not a dab, the new dab proposed should be created at Royal Princess (disambiguation) leaving the SI article intact as is Lyndaship ( talk) 07:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
An image used in this article,
File:Royal-Princess-Princess2013-.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 11:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Royal Princess (2013). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The article said the ship was en route to "Whittier", which I have assumed means Whittier, Alaska, but the cited source says it was en route to Anchorage. Which is correct? Both of them apparently have a suitable port with cruise ship facilities. — BarrelProof ( talk) 19:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Royal Princess (2012) be
renamed and moved to
Royal Princess.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
Royal Princess (2012) → Royal Princess – the two ships on List of ships named Royal Princess, resembling with the same name is now irrelevant since they're now have been renamed and now aren't called Royal Princess. 49.149.110.214 ( talk) 02:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The article List of ships named Royal Princess is a set index and therefore a list article and not a dab, the new dab proposed should be created at Royal Princess (disambiguation) leaving the SI article intact as is Lyndaship ( talk) 07:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)