![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This information is in the public domain, on the RGP website. There is no copyright notice attached to the article. Ecememl has become obsessed with me, as I have challenged his abuse of position in the Gibrlatar article at .es.
Obviously you don't understand anything about copyright. All the material present in Internet (everywhere in fact) is copyrighted unless noticed. Not in the opposite way. And this is not the case. -- Ecemaml 12:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Ecemaml, not only are you acting as self-appointed dictator in .es, now your obsession is spilling over into here. If the author of the article in question wished to copyright it, he would have done so. This is not a copyright issue anyway, the issue here is your obsessive badgering of me. Get a life. You are now attempting to portray yourself as self-appointed expert in everything. You are not. PROVE your copyright allegations. And leave me alone. -- Gibraltarian 14:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC) P.S. how come the 3rv rule doee not apply to Ecemaml?
I have written a (basic) replacement article at Royal Gibraltar Police/Temp. Gibraltarian, if you would like to add any further information on the RGP, you would be most welcome to do so at its temp page. Happy editing. Take care all. SoLando ( Talk) 20:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Simplicity itself:
So for both these reasons, we cannot directly copy and paste that article.
So there's an easy solution: just write a new article using the facts from the website but not its structure, sentences, or phrasing. Simplicity itself. Doops | talk 03:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk 06:17, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
This sounds doubtful. I suspect a qualification of "in the British Empire" or similar is missing ? -- MBRZ48 ( talk) 07:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I have changed the InfoBox back the standard one for all law enforcement agencies. There is a slow but background activity to place the standard infobox on all law enforcement agency articles. While the reason given for the earlier change was not a correct one, the move to the new standard InfoBox was correct. Peet Ern ( talk) 00:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This information is in the public domain, on the RGP website. There is no copyright notice attached to the article. Ecememl has become obsessed with me, as I have challenged his abuse of position in the Gibrlatar article at .es.
Obviously you don't understand anything about copyright. All the material present in Internet (everywhere in fact) is copyrighted unless noticed. Not in the opposite way. And this is not the case. -- Ecemaml 12:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Ecemaml, not only are you acting as self-appointed dictator in .es, now your obsession is spilling over into here. If the author of the article in question wished to copyright it, he would have done so. This is not a copyright issue anyway, the issue here is your obsessive badgering of me. Get a life. You are now attempting to portray yourself as self-appointed expert in everything. You are not. PROVE your copyright allegations. And leave me alone. -- Gibraltarian 14:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC) P.S. how come the 3rv rule doee not apply to Ecemaml?
I have written a (basic) replacement article at Royal Gibraltar Police/Temp. Gibraltarian, if you would like to add any further information on the RGP, you would be most welcome to do so at its temp page. Happy editing. Take care all. SoLando ( Talk) 20:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Simplicity itself:
So for both these reasons, we cannot directly copy and paste that article.
So there's an easy solution: just write a new article using the facts from the website but not its structure, sentences, or phrasing. Simplicity itself. Doops | talk 03:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk 06:17, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
This sounds doubtful. I suspect a qualification of "in the British Empire" or similar is missing ? -- MBRZ48 ( talk) 07:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I have changed the InfoBox back the standard one for all law enforcement agencies. There is a slow but background activity to place the standard infobox on all law enforcement agency articles. While the reason given for the earlier change was not a correct one, the move to the new standard InfoBox was correct. Peet Ern ( talk) 00:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)