This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance). MonmouthpediA Top‑importance This article is related to MonmouthpediA and to Monmouth – the World's first Wikipedia town. As of May 2012, we have 1,000 QRpedia codes displayed in the town. See what we are doing, See a bit of what we've done and help us!MonmouthpediAWikipedia:GLAM/MONTemplate:WikiProject MonmouthpediAMonmouthpediA-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Certainly the Royal should be merged into this as they are the same building. It was my mistake to create 5 Monk Street in the first place without checking that the RG existed. But 5 MS is the better title as the building hasn't been the RG for years. KJP1 ( talk) 08:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

I've done a bit of digging and it looks as if the building is currently called Royal George House and has been converted into flats – see, e.g. here. I've therefore created c:Category:Royal George House on Wikimedia Commons. Unless there's any objection I'll change the title of this article as well. Ham II ( talk) 15:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

No strong views, but 5 Monk Street might prove to have greater longevity. It’s had a few names since the Royal George closed in the 70s? KJP1 ( talk) 15:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC) reply

I've gone ahead with Royal George House. I haven't yet found a good reliable source for its current use as flats. Ham II ( talk) 07:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC) reply