This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've started a major rewrite of the page, expanding especially the details of what's in the gardens. I have added image galleries and will get some better images soon. I will continue with the page in the next day or two. Stuart midgley ( talk) 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone agree that there should be more/better pictures in this artcile than a tree??? I mean it doesnt exactly represent much of the garden Jackp 06:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I'll search for them and when I found them, I'll post the link here and you or who ever else can add them Jackp 09:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Got a picture! It may need to be scaled down, though-here is the link: [1] Jackp 09:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
There's a number of much better pictures in Wikimedia Commons so I'm going to make a gallery. I think a gallery is justified in this case as I'll choose ones that give a direct impression of the gardens and the major features within them. Stuart midgley ( talk) 11:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Can someone double check as much of the text is copied from [2]. It seems to have been edited in by User:Jackp (surprise, surprise). I haven't got the time right now to work out what is a copy and what can stay, so this is as much a reminder to me to fix, unless someone has time to check! -- Steve (Stephen) talk 10:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
What was the result of playing loud music to the flying foxes? Wanderer57 ( talk) 21:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
They were finally chased out in about 2013 I think - they're not there any more. I'll find some references and update the section. Stuart midgley ( talk) 11:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Could someone weigh in as to whether this the Royal Botanic Garden or the Royal Botanic Gardens? Most sources in print seem to prefer the plural, but the institution's website has it as a singular everywhere except in its heading. Maddening for the copy editors among us. -- grant ( talk) 19:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
A heading seeking content. CamV8 ( talk) 23:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Royal Botanic Garden, Sydney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've started a major rewrite of the page, expanding especially the details of what's in the gardens. I have added image galleries and will get some better images soon. I will continue with the page in the next day or two. Stuart midgley ( talk) 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone agree that there should be more/better pictures in this artcile than a tree??? I mean it doesnt exactly represent much of the garden Jackp 06:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I'll search for them and when I found them, I'll post the link here and you or who ever else can add them Jackp 09:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Got a picture! It may need to be scaled down, though-here is the link: [1] Jackp 09:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
There's a number of much better pictures in Wikimedia Commons so I'm going to make a gallery. I think a gallery is justified in this case as I'll choose ones that give a direct impression of the gardens and the major features within them. Stuart midgley ( talk) 11:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Can someone double check as much of the text is copied from [2]. It seems to have been edited in by User:Jackp (surprise, surprise). I haven't got the time right now to work out what is a copy and what can stay, so this is as much a reminder to me to fix, unless someone has time to check! -- Steve (Stephen) talk 10:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
What was the result of playing loud music to the flying foxes? Wanderer57 ( talk) 21:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
They were finally chased out in about 2013 I think - they're not there any more. I'll find some references and update the section. Stuart midgley ( talk) 11:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Could someone weigh in as to whether this the Royal Botanic Garden or the Royal Botanic Gardens? Most sources in print seem to prefer the plural, but the institution's website has it as a singular everywhere except in its heading. Maddening for the copy editors among us. -- grant ( talk) 19:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
A heading seeking content. CamV8 ( talk) 23:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Royal Botanic Garden, Sydney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)