This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Rowland Lee (bishop) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
Anglicanism and the
Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. The nom's rationale is wrong - primarytopic has nothing to with being "a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". Instead, using the actual criteria of usage and significance, we see that this topic gets
well less than half of pageviews, so does not qualify. No evidence has been presented about long-term significance.
Dohn joe (
talk)
18:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Absent the instant recognition of such multi-name primary topics as
John Kennedy,
Winston Churchill or
Elizabeth Taylor and lacking discussions establishing consensus, most primary topics are either grandfathered as the first entry created under that name or chosen as a result of personal opinion. Although recent extended argumentations at
Talk:David Jack#Requested move 6 July 2020 or
Talk:John Nutt#Requested move 5 August 2020 ultimately failed to dislodge these marginal-primacy individuals from their positions, they also demonstrated that a number of longtime Wikipedians feel that being a historical figure of sufficient prominence does play a role in establishing consensus for primacy. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Rowland Lee (bishop) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
Anglicanism and the
Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. The nom's rationale is wrong - primarytopic has nothing to with being "a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". Instead, using the actual criteria of usage and significance, we see that this topic gets
well less than half of pageviews, so does not qualify. No evidence has been presented about long-term significance.
Dohn joe (
talk)
18:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Absent the instant recognition of such multi-name primary topics as
John Kennedy,
Winston Churchill or
Elizabeth Taylor and lacking discussions establishing consensus, most primary topics are either grandfathered as the first entry created under that name or chosen as a result of personal opinion. Although recent extended argumentations at
Talk:David Jack#Requested move 6 July 2020 or
Talk:John Nutt#Requested move 5 August 2020 ultimately failed to dislodge these marginal-primacy individuals from their positions, they also demonstrated that a number of longtime Wikipedians feel that being a historical figure of sufficient prominence does play a role in establishing consensus for primacy. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.