The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. If and when another article is created, the options can be discussed again then. Cúchullain ^t/ c 15:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Rowan steam railmotor → Rowan steam railmotor (Victoria) – Rowan steam railmotors were used in several countries and in more than one state of Australia. This article describes just one of them used in one state of Australia. I request the move so Rowan steam railmotor (Victoria) can continue to describe this one and Rowan steam railmotor can become a generic article about the type. Junior Lightfoot ( talk) 09:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

• Support straightforward. In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Until there is a replacement article it's impossible to decide which should be at this title. Tassedethe ( talk)
• Oppose. As per McKeen railmotor, as there was only a few made i think having separate articles is just going to duplicate information. If we gave Victoria a separate article, we have set a precedent for each place they were used to also have their own. -- Dan027 ( talk) 12:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per Dan027. Additionally, if there's a title like Rowan steam railmotor (Victoria), readers will likely expect a separate Rowan steam railmotor. This is an issue to be solved through the regular editing process—either by expanding this article or creating new ones—not RM. -- BDD ( talk) 21:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.