![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've suggested merging Rover 25 into the Rover 200 article, as the 25 was just a facelifted version of the 200.
An alternative would be to have 2 articles:
- links at the top of each page to redirect people to the other article
What do people think?
Note that i've suggested an analogous move for Rover 45 and Rover 400. Spute 11:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
I love the idea of having two Rover articles: one for the Honda based models and one for the British-designed 200-series/25. They are completely different cars afterall. CyanIsland ( talk) 19:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes, 'Rover 200/25' for the Rover designed models and 'Rover 200 Series' for the Honda-based models sounds perfect. The same could be done for the Rover 400 Series/45 models, too, as it would keep these pages in line with the 600 and 800 Series. CyanIsland ( talk) 02:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
OK, so I went ahead and created a page for the Honda-based models. It's called Rover 200 Series / 400 Series (as the second generation 200 and first generation 400 were the same car). I've simply moved what information was already on the 25 and 45 pages, nothing's been deleted and the Rover 25 and 45 pages have not yet been renamed. CyanIsland ( talk) 01:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I know the statement about the K-Series in the Metro/200 having alarming rates of head gasket failure is uncited but I recommend it stays. If my personal experiences are anything to go by, the K-Series engines in little Rover cars indeed having an alarming tendency to fail (and take the radiator with them). £500 the local greasepit wanted for a fix. And on a 1100 N reg. Good performmance though, really. Citation enough Plutonium27 ( talk) 20:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
How about if it is linked to the K Series page? That (and any personal probs removed) enough? Plutonium27 ( talk) 16:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I am an Australian mechanic and I worked on English rubbish for 35 yrs. If it's English it's rubbish. Exceptions: LX series Gardner, and Perkins 4.236 & 6.354.1. Bedford's were OK, and Fords, but then they're not English. Worst of the worst: Petter-Lister and Rover. Only Indian copies can possibly be worse than these things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.237.29 ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The following text was added to the article by User:Pierce51/ User Pierce62. I have moved it to the talk page as the appropriate forum for discussions.
Lozleader ( talk) 20:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
support - no need to have a separate page for 200 BRM IMO. Tubefurnace ( talk) 19:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
support - 200 BRM page content could be better presented within the appropriate generation's section on 200 Series page, can see no justification for a separate page for this variant Splateagle ( talk) 08:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
support -- Typ932 T· C 15:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
support - CyanIsland ( talk) 15:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Can someone point to any sources to verify the claim that the Rover 25 has been sold by SAIC as the Roewe 250 or 350? AFAIK, this is a Roewe 350, and it's not a Rover 25! Letdorf ( talk) 20:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC).
I removed this unsourced statement:
Owners' main complaints about the interior ranged from relatively poor quality materials, to general fit and finish of trim although this is subject to personal opinion.
Not really appropriate unless there are sources for this or contemporary road test remarks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.33.106 ( talk) 15:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Didn't anybody compare the shape of the Rover 25 with the Allegro. They're looking pretty similar in some kind. Honza ( talk) 10:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Rover 200 / 25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.whatcar.com/car-news/what-car-awards-the-winners/previous-car-of-the-year-winners/237223When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rover 200 / 25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've suggested merging Rover 25 into the Rover 200 article, as the 25 was just a facelifted version of the 200.
An alternative would be to have 2 articles:
- links at the top of each page to redirect people to the other article
What do people think?
Note that i've suggested an analogous move for Rover 45 and Rover 400. Spute 11:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
I love the idea of having two Rover articles: one for the Honda based models and one for the British-designed 200-series/25. They are completely different cars afterall. CyanIsland ( talk) 19:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes, 'Rover 200/25' for the Rover designed models and 'Rover 200 Series' for the Honda-based models sounds perfect. The same could be done for the Rover 400 Series/45 models, too, as it would keep these pages in line with the 600 and 800 Series. CyanIsland ( talk) 02:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
OK, so I went ahead and created a page for the Honda-based models. It's called Rover 200 Series / 400 Series (as the second generation 200 and first generation 400 were the same car). I've simply moved what information was already on the 25 and 45 pages, nothing's been deleted and the Rover 25 and 45 pages have not yet been renamed. CyanIsland ( talk) 01:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I know the statement about the K-Series in the Metro/200 having alarming rates of head gasket failure is uncited but I recommend it stays. If my personal experiences are anything to go by, the K-Series engines in little Rover cars indeed having an alarming tendency to fail (and take the radiator with them). £500 the local greasepit wanted for a fix. And on a 1100 N reg. Good performmance though, really. Citation enough Plutonium27 ( talk) 20:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
How about if it is linked to the K Series page? That (and any personal probs removed) enough? Plutonium27 ( talk) 16:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I am an Australian mechanic and I worked on English rubbish for 35 yrs. If it's English it's rubbish. Exceptions: LX series Gardner, and Perkins 4.236 & 6.354.1. Bedford's were OK, and Fords, but then they're not English. Worst of the worst: Petter-Lister and Rover. Only Indian copies can possibly be worse than these things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.237.29 ( talk) 11:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The following text was added to the article by User:Pierce51/ User Pierce62. I have moved it to the talk page as the appropriate forum for discussions.
Lozleader ( talk) 20:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
support - no need to have a separate page for 200 BRM IMO. Tubefurnace ( talk) 19:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
support - 200 BRM page content could be better presented within the appropriate generation's section on 200 Series page, can see no justification for a separate page for this variant Splateagle ( talk) 08:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
support -- Typ932 T· C 15:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
support - CyanIsland ( talk) 15:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Can someone point to any sources to verify the claim that the Rover 25 has been sold by SAIC as the Roewe 250 or 350? AFAIK, this is a Roewe 350, and it's not a Rover 25! Letdorf ( talk) 20:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC).
I removed this unsourced statement:
Owners' main complaints about the interior ranged from relatively poor quality materials, to general fit and finish of trim although this is subject to personal opinion.
Not really appropriate unless there are sources for this or contemporary road test remarks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.33.106 ( talk) 15:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Didn't anybody compare the shape of the Rover 25 with the Allegro. They're looking pretty similar in some kind. Honza ( talk) 10:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Rover 200 / 25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.whatcar.com/car-news/what-car-awards-the-winners/previous-car-of-the-year-winners/237223When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rover 200 / 25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)