This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Nicely-done, Lead section lays out notability claims, everything else is according to the WP:MOS guidelines for those article parameters.
Shearonink (
talk)
17:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
I've read through the article several times today, in my opinion it fulfills the
WP:GA Criteria. This is a straightforward well-referenced article about a factual non-controversial subject. There aren't any edit-wars or POV content. Going forward, the article will need to be kept updated with changes to the route and also any future news-coverage about the associated coming/planned Link light rail changes (community controversies? cost overruns? etc.) should be included.
Shearonink (
talk)
22:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the review,
Shearonink. Future changes to this article will not include light rail costs and controversies, as that is outside of the scope (part of the criteria) and would be covered instead on the light rail articles. SounderBruce23:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply
I misspoke there, should have used more precise language. I was thinking more along the lines of when the light-rail does come in ca 2020, that people who were used to the old bus route will have an opinion (pro or con) about the changes to the bus route itself plus the route itself will change since the tunnel will be reserved for the light-rail. Thanks for the correction.
Shearonink (
talk)
23:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Nicely-done, Lead section lays out notability claims, everything else is according to the WP:MOS guidelines for those article parameters.
Shearonink (
talk)
17:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
I've read through the article several times today, in my opinion it fulfills the
WP:GA Criteria. This is a straightforward well-referenced article about a factual non-controversial subject. There aren't any edit-wars or POV content. Going forward, the article will need to be kept updated with changes to the route and also any future news-coverage about the associated coming/planned Link light rail changes (community controversies? cost overruns? etc.) should be included.
Shearonink (
talk)
22:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the review,
Shearonink. Future changes to this article will not include light rail costs and controversies, as that is outside of the scope (part of the criteria) and would be covered instead on the light rail articles. SounderBruce23:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply
I misspoke there, should have used more precise language. I was thinking more along the lines of when the light-rail does come in ca 2020, that people who were used to the old bus route will have an opinion (pro or con) about the changes to the bus route itself plus the route itself will change since the tunnel will be reserved for the light-rail. Thanks for the correction.
Shearonink (
talk)
23:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)reply