![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
i hear that rotom is classified as the alien gel pokemon. anyone know what said classification means? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.154.118 ( talk) 15:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
Is Rotom a legend? i heard this in beckett pokemon collectors list of legendary pokemon. are they right or wrong?-- 65.54.154.117 20:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-Wrong, since it's breedable with ditto, you could have as many rotoms as you'd like in one game, true legendaries are 100% unique (in one game). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.190.253.129 ( talk)
oh, okay.-- 65.54.155.35 21:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Concerning whether Rotom is legendary or not, I'll say what I typed in
Talk:Phione:
I think Phione should be considered "sub-legendary" along with
Unown. Both have close relations to legendaries, but they're not one-of-a-kind in any of the main games.
Rotom is a bit more confusing. Considering it a legendary would make the Sinnoh legendaries to be the only legendaries that don't start with that gen's trio (in the Dex). Not considering it a legendary would make it the only non-legendary/old gen evolution
that does not appear in any regional dex. Perhaps a "sub-legendary," too? --
Jopasopa
16:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm neutral in this debate, but just have a comment. So if Rotom is "sub-legendary" because it is found in one instance of the game, yet is breedable, that means that the following Pokémon are also "sub-legendary": Riolu/Lucario, every starter from Generation I-IV, Togepi/Togetic/Togekiss, maybe Manaphy/Phione, Eevee and all 7 of its evolutions, etc. SuperDT 04:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
This is false. Gengar, Wheezing, and probably a couple of others have Levitate as well, and are yet weak to ground. In this generation, there is also Bronzong. So while yes, Rotom has levitate, it was never exclusive to any real pokemon.
-- 69.138.232.32 23:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
::: I had put 2 new sentences about it on the sentence under it biology. It is the 2 last sentences on this section. Don't erase it unless you can really have a case about it bcause some of you people really are annyoing about this kinds of stuff (cough-Trusilver-cough)::: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.150.156.97 ( talk)
Sorry, I accidentally while editing something screwed up the biological characteristics section. I don't know how to fix it, can sum1 help me wit dat please? I' so sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.144.158.42 ( talk)
This contributes to the fact that Rotom is found only after inspecting the TV at the old Chateau
Rotom is one of 107 new Pokémon that were introduced in Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Rotom can be found in the Old Chateau after receiving the National Dex by inspecting the TV at night.
I think that you both are being incivil. Jeske, you should just delete this whole talk section because what you and that fool are babbling about does not pretain to the article. By the way mister nameless you started the fight by saying that your "indents" were proper grammer, but you finnished the argument by using words that aren't in the dictionary, "If you ever managed to get through basic school..." 12.240.29.68 23:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)the decider
People keep editing in that Rotom is the same "height and weight as the Uxie, Azelf, and Mesprit". In fact, the latest editor decided to insult me for removing this information. I argue that this bit of trivia is completely inconsequential, and has no need to be in this article. MANY pokemon share heights and weights. For example, Azurill and Natu are the same in both, as are Shellder and Ditto, etc. I argue that some minor coincidence such as this is utterly unimportant, and has no place in articles like this. Any thoughts? Rorshacma 04:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
If you look under the history tab you can see that the comment Rorshacma was referencing clearly is a personal attack. And in my opinion BlackStarRock, 70.144.143.165, and 207.69.140.35 are the same person, check the latter's talk page. Joinred1127 21:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning that Rotom's name is motor spelled backwards?-- 207.69.140.35 19:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd say it is, but then, some could consider it fan speculation. Joinred1127 19:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I phrased my sentence wrong. I wasn't paying attention and thought you said that rotom was motor spelled backwards because rotom makes electrical equipment stop working (opposite of a motor). That would be fan speculation though, but I agree with that! ;)
Joinred1127
01:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
If anyone types in "Rotom" from now on, they my go to Rotom instead of the list that Rotom redirects to. Heh heh... if any one knows anything Rotom related add it on...until it might be erased and be reformed back into a redirect page. Uh...... bye! Arceus493 ( talk) 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
i hear that rotom is classified as the alien gel pokemon. anyone know what said classification means? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.154.118 ( talk) 15:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC).
Is Rotom a legend? i heard this in beckett pokemon collectors list of legendary pokemon. are they right or wrong?-- 65.54.154.117 20:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-Wrong, since it's breedable with ditto, you could have as many rotoms as you'd like in one game, true legendaries are 100% unique (in one game). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.190.253.129 ( talk)
oh, okay.-- 65.54.155.35 21:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Concerning whether Rotom is legendary or not, I'll say what I typed in
Talk:Phione:
I think Phione should be considered "sub-legendary" along with
Unown. Both have close relations to legendaries, but they're not one-of-a-kind in any of the main games.
Rotom is a bit more confusing. Considering it a legendary would make the Sinnoh legendaries to be the only legendaries that don't start with that gen's trio (in the Dex). Not considering it a legendary would make it the only non-legendary/old gen evolution
that does not appear in any regional dex. Perhaps a "sub-legendary," too? --
Jopasopa
16:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm neutral in this debate, but just have a comment. So if Rotom is "sub-legendary" because it is found in one instance of the game, yet is breedable, that means that the following Pokémon are also "sub-legendary": Riolu/Lucario, every starter from Generation I-IV, Togepi/Togetic/Togekiss, maybe Manaphy/Phione, Eevee and all 7 of its evolutions, etc. SuperDT 04:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
This is false. Gengar, Wheezing, and probably a couple of others have Levitate as well, and are yet weak to ground. In this generation, there is also Bronzong. So while yes, Rotom has levitate, it was never exclusive to any real pokemon.
-- 69.138.232.32 23:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
::: I had put 2 new sentences about it on the sentence under it biology. It is the 2 last sentences on this section. Don't erase it unless you can really have a case about it bcause some of you people really are annyoing about this kinds of stuff (cough-Trusilver-cough)::: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.150.156.97 ( talk)
Sorry, I accidentally while editing something screwed up the biological characteristics section. I don't know how to fix it, can sum1 help me wit dat please? I' so sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.144.158.42 ( talk)
This contributes to the fact that Rotom is found only after inspecting the TV at the old Chateau
Rotom is one of 107 new Pokémon that were introduced in Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Rotom can be found in the Old Chateau after receiving the National Dex by inspecting the TV at night.
I think that you both are being incivil. Jeske, you should just delete this whole talk section because what you and that fool are babbling about does not pretain to the article. By the way mister nameless you started the fight by saying that your "indents" were proper grammer, but you finnished the argument by using words that aren't in the dictionary, "If you ever managed to get through basic school..." 12.240.29.68 23:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)the decider
People keep editing in that Rotom is the same "height and weight as the Uxie, Azelf, and Mesprit". In fact, the latest editor decided to insult me for removing this information. I argue that this bit of trivia is completely inconsequential, and has no need to be in this article. MANY pokemon share heights and weights. For example, Azurill and Natu are the same in both, as are Shellder and Ditto, etc. I argue that some minor coincidence such as this is utterly unimportant, and has no place in articles like this. Any thoughts? Rorshacma 04:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
If you look under the history tab you can see that the comment Rorshacma was referencing clearly is a personal attack. And in my opinion BlackStarRock, 70.144.143.165, and 207.69.140.35 are the same person, check the latter's talk page. Joinred1127 21:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning that Rotom's name is motor spelled backwards?-- 207.69.140.35 19:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd say it is, but then, some could consider it fan speculation. Joinred1127 19:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
I phrased my sentence wrong. I wasn't paying attention and thought you said that rotom was motor spelled backwards because rotom makes electrical equipment stop working (opposite of a motor). That would be fan speculation though, but I agree with that! ;)
Joinred1127
01:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
If anyone types in "Rotom" from now on, they my go to Rotom instead of the list that Rotom redirects to. Heh heh... if any one knows anything Rotom related add it on...until it might be erased and be reformed back into a redirect page. Uh...... bye! Arceus493 ( talk) 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)