This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The sources regarding the halahik controversies were valid, on point, and cited. There was no reason to remove them. They help paint a more well rounded picture of the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.89.95 ( talk) 04:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The article about the town is entitled Rosh Pinna, although the official English name is "Rosh Pina" and all the official and semi-official references on the web show the latter as well. That is probably just a Wikipedia quirk, because the Rosh Pina minyan got the one-"n" name for itself. The minyan article should become "Rosh Pina (minyan)", and the town-related article should become "Rosh Pina" , period. Everything else is hilarious. Arminden ( talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Arminden, also using data from Arminden ( talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Izaakb
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The sources regarding the halahik controversies were valid, on point, and cited. There was no reason to remove them. They help paint a more well rounded picture of the topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.89.95 ( talk) 04:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The article about the town is entitled Rosh Pinna, although the official English name is "Rosh Pina" and all the official and semi-official references on the web show the latter as well. That is probably just a Wikipedia quirk, because the Rosh Pina minyan got the one-"n" name for itself. The minyan article should become "Rosh Pina (minyan)", and the town-related article should become "Rosh Pina" , period. Everything else is hilarious. Arminden ( talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Arminden, also using data from Arminden ( talk) 12:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Izaakb