GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Arctic Night 02:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm undertaking a review of this article at the moment and will provide some general comments here. I will provide my adjudication once all of those comments have been given. Arctic Night 02:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
For the time being, I am going to put this article on hold for seven days to give editors a chance to come along and respond to the concerns I have highlighted here. If I do not receive a response within seven days, I will be left with no choice but to fail the article. If I do not respond myself after a reasonable period of time should you feel you have addressed these issues, please use the 'email me' function to contact me, as I often go offline for periods of time. Arctic Night 02:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I will get working on your concerns. Just as a reminder, the GA criteria do not require a footnote in each paragraph, just "provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged" Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 04:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
NB:
Racepacket has been indefinitely blocked for copyvios,
[1] including some in this article. So i suggest that you fail immediately.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 16:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC) User:Ryulong established that Jezhotwells' copying concern resulted from another website copying from this Wikipedia article. We shall restart the GA review process.
Racepacket (
talk)
00:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Arctic Night 02:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm undertaking a review of this article at the moment and will provide some general comments here. I will provide my adjudication once all of those comments have been given. Arctic Night 02:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
For the time being, I am going to put this article on hold for seven days to give editors a chance to come along and respond to the concerns I have highlighted here. If I do not receive a response within seven days, I will be left with no choice but to fail the article. If I do not respond myself after a reasonable period of time should you feel you have addressed these issues, please use the 'email me' function to contact me, as I often go offline for periods of time. Arctic Night 02:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I will get working on your concerns. Just as a reminder, the GA criteria do not require a footnote in each paragraph, just "provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged" Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 04:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
NB:
Racepacket has been indefinitely blocked for copyvios,
[1] including some in this article. So i suggest that you fail immediately.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 16:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC) User:Ryulong established that Jezhotwells' copying concern resulted from another website copying from this Wikipedia article. We shall restart the GA review process.
Racepacket (
talk)
00:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)