This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rosemount Hospital article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Kerry Raymond: I don't think the edit regarding the current status of the hospital was accurate. I was about to post a comment here because I was confused about the sources a few days ago, but concluded that the article was correct and didn't post it.
The hospital was added to the Heritage Register in 1999, and the site inspection clearly notes that the building was in use at that time by the organisations that the article said it was. This would obviously make it hard for the site to be abandoned and derelict in 1999, unless the listing was seriously outdated at the time of its approval, or the original author seriously inept.
I was leaning towards either of those two conclusions until I checked the Royal Brisbane Hospital website and noted that the services the article stated were still listed as being offered at Rosemount in 2014.
I think the Karuna website is misleading - I think they meant their current building was abandoned in 1994, which is consistent with the description (that mentions several abandoned buildings on the site in 1999) even if I'm not sure which one they're referring to.
I am very open to other ideas but I think the Heritage Register was correct on this one? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 12:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I feel as though this article has lost its focus on the actual hospital, and has become too concerned with the physical heritage building. While the building is definitely worthy of attention in its own right, I feel as though the focus of this article, as implied by its name, should be on the functioning hospital/health service that lies within the building. An article focused on the building should be titled "Rosemount Hospital building" instead etc, as to avoid any confusion. Tim ( Talk) 09:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rosemount Hospital article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Kerry Raymond: I don't think the edit regarding the current status of the hospital was accurate. I was about to post a comment here because I was confused about the sources a few days ago, but concluded that the article was correct and didn't post it.
The hospital was added to the Heritage Register in 1999, and the site inspection clearly notes that the building was in use at that time by the organisations that the article said it was. This would obviously make it hard for the site to be abandoned and derelict in 1999, unless the listing was seriously outdated at the time of its approval, or the original author seriously inept.
I was leaning towards either of those two conclusions until I checked the Royal Brisbane Hospital website and noted that the services the article stated were still listed as being offered at Rosemount in 2014.
I think the Karuna website is misleading - I think they meant their current building was abandoned in 1994, which is consistent with the description (that mentions several abandoned buildings on the site in 1999) even if I'm not sure which one they're referring to.
I am very open to other ideas but I think the Heritage Register was correct on this one? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 12:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I feel as though this article has lost its focus on the actual hospital, and has become too concerned with the physical heritage building. While the building is definitely worthy of attention in its own right, I feel as though the focus of this article, as implied by its name, should be on the functioning hospital/health service that lies within the building. An article focused on the building should be titled "Rosemount Hospital building" instead etc, as to avoid any confusion. Tim ( Talk) 09:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)