This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
There were several reasons why I removed this addition. I cited
WP:ELNO, in particular #1, in my edit summary, but there are also concerns about reliability. These papers were just published and have not been vetted (reviewed) by the mathematical community and this isn't offset by the publisher's business model which has been considered predatory for some of its journals. After these papers have received some sort of favorable review, they may be included in a further reading section, but not as external links. --
Bill Cherowitzo (
talk)
18:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)reply
No doubt that some are and I am not in a position to say anything about this particular journal. Our best policy would be to wait until the articles are reviewed by some authority (like Math Reviews) and that would remove any stigmata about the articles. --
Bill Cherowitzo (
talk)
18:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
There were several reasons why I removed this addition. I cited
WP:ELNO, in particular #1, in my edit summary, but there are also concerns about reliability. These papers were just published and have not been vetted (reviewed) by the mathematical community and this isn't offset by the publisher's business model which has been considered predatory for some of its journals. After these papers have received some sort of favorable review, they may be included in a further reading section, but not as external links. --
Bill Cherowitzo (
talk)
18:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)reply
No doubt that some are and I am not in a position to say anything about this particular journal. Our best policy would be to wait until the articles are reviewed by some authority (like Math Reviews) and that would remove any stigmata about the articles. --
Bill Cherowitzo (
talk)
18:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply