![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PBS Frontline just covered this room and its contents on 2007-05-15.
I'm removing the original picture as it is not, in fact, a Narus STA-6400, but is a picture of the Clarkson Univerisity Open Source Institute COSI laboratory.
The article current reads "...were occupied by AT&T before SBC purchased AT&T and changed its name to AT&T". Shouldn't this read "changed its name to SBC"? The sentence doesn't make sense. The room used to be owned by AT&T; it is now SBC, right?
If I understand things correctly, the room was owned by AT&T, but SBC bought AT&T, thereby absorbing AT&T into SBC. However, SBC, wanting to bank on the famous name, changed their name (SBC) to AT&T. The sentence makes sense that way, yes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.0.43 ( talk) 16:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The article states the case was heard by a court, what was the outcome? Sephiroth storm ( talk) 10:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Hepting v. AT&T (with a redirect) because it's short, is not likely to grow, and is only an artifact of the legal case concerning wiretapping. — EqualRights ( talk) 11:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn OK, I'll revisit eventually. — EqualRights ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
A possible merge target could be Upstream program. Here a source that describes what "upstream collection" is:
The original source is this comment by Dianne Feinstein. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 00:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
You asked me once, what was in Room 641A. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 641A is the worst thing in the world.
— O'Brien
It brings similar thoughts, doesn't it? ComradeSlice ( talk) 13:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
i guess that someone might add the tapping node, as cryptically mentioned in EFF court filing, mentioned clearly here http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/05/23/212557/-NSA-s-San-Francisco-Surveillance-Detailed 78.134.117.13 ( talk) 13:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PBS Frontline just covered this room and its contents on 2007-05-15.
I'm removing the original picture as it is not, in fact, a Narus STA-6400, but is a picture of the Clarkson Univerisity Open Source Institute COSI laboratory.
The article current reads "...were occupied by AT&T before SBC purchased AT&T and changed its name to AT&T". Shouldn't this read "changed its name to SBC"? The sentence doesn't make sense. The room used to be owned by AT&T; it is now SBC, right?
If I understand things correctly, the room was owned by AT&T, but SBC bought AT&T, thereby absorbing AT&T into SBC. However, SBC, wanting to bank on the famous name, changed their name (SBC) to AT&T. The sentence makes sense that way, yes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.0.43 ( talk) 16:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The article states the case was heard by a court, what was the outcome? Sephiroth storm ( talk) 10:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Hepting v. AT&T (with a redirect) because it's short, is not likely to grow, and is only an artifact of the legal case concerning wiretapping. — EqualRights ( talk) 11:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn OK, I'll revisit eventually. — EqualRights ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
A possible merge target could be Upstream program. Here a source that describes what "upstream collection" is:
The original source is this comment by Dianne Feinstein. -- Petri Krohn ( talk) 00:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
You asked me once, what was in Room 641A. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 641A is the worst thing in the world.
— O'Brien
It brings similar thoughts, doesn't it? ComradeSlice ( talk) 13:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
i guess that someone might add the tapping node, as cryptically mentioned in EFF court filing, mentioned clearly here http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/05/23/212557/-NSA-s-San-Francisco-Surveillance-Detailed 78.134.117.13 ( talk) 13:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)