From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger Proposal

This should be merged with Romula. The subject is markedly similar and neither article is well-developed. 24.157.18.27 ( talk) 18:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC) reply

  • No, it should not be merged. The principle is distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related. The quality of article has no role concerning the subjects. Saturnian ( talk) 11:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC) reply
    • Merge; the fort associated with a city can easily be discussed within the context of the city, particularly when the fort page is a long-standing stub. Discussion of the fort benefits from the context of the city page. So, this merge is clearly consistent with WP:MERGEREASON on the grounds of Context. There is no "principle [of] distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related". Klbrain ( talk) 20:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger Proposal

This should be merged with Romula. The subject is markedly similar and neither article is well-developed. 24.157.18.27 ( talk) 18:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC) reply

  • No, it should not be merged. The principle is distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related. The quality of article has no role concerning the subjects. Saturnian ( talk) 11:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC) reply
    • Merge; the fort associated with a city can easily be discussed within the context of the city, particularly when the fort page is a long-standing stub. Discussion of the fort benefits from the context of the city page. So, this merge is clearly consistent with WP:MERGEREASON on the grounds of Context. There is no "principle [of] distinct articles for distinct things even those things are related". Klbrain ( talk) 20:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook