The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 02:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
What an interesting subject--even though this movie sounds quite terrible, it's impressive that he put something on this scale together. This article appears to cover major aspects of its subject and to be fairly well-sourced. Thanks for your work to get it up to this point.
I'm concerned, though, with the persistent copyediting and accuracy problems I seem to be encountering. I had to do some rewriting for grammar throughout [1], and some questions remain (below). More seriously, a few spotchecks immediately turned up issues with accuracy--a major statement that appears to be wrong (that the movie was completely unscripted), an inaccurate quotation, the wrong name of a film festival, etc. This article appears to need re-checking from top to bottom, and that's outside the scope of this review.
For these reasons, I'm not listing the article at this time. But I hope you'll review and address these concerns, and consider nominating this again in the future--it's an interesting topic that I'd love to see reach GA. Again, thanks for all your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 12:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 02:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
What an interesting subject--even though this movie sounds quite terrible, it's impressive that he put something on this scale together. This article appears to cover major aspects of its subject and to be fairly well-sourced. Thanks for your work to get it up to this point.
I'm concerned, though, with the persistent copyediting and accuracy problems I seem to be encountering. I had to do some rewriting for grammar throughout [1], and some questions remain (below). More seriously, a few spotchecks immediately turned up issues with accuracy--a major statement that appears to be wrong (that the movie was completely unscripted), an inaccurate quotation, the wrong name of a film festival, etc. This article appears to need re-checking from top to bottom, and that's outside the scope of this review.
For these reasons, I'm not listing the article at this time. But I hope you'll review and address these concerns, and consider nominating this again in the future--it's an interesting topic that I'd love to see reach GA. Again, thanks for all your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 12:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)