 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
has anybody read this book? any suggestions on the introduction part? ( Rachelskit ( talk) 21:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC))
This section is only an analysis of the historical background of the pinarii and potii. I think two things need to be done (preferably by someone who has read the book...): 1. Rename this section and make it clear in its first sentence that it is an analysis of the historical background of the pinarii and potii.
2. Create a new section where knowledegable readers may describe/comment historical accuracies/inaccuracies of the book; poltical, cultural or otherwise. -- Djingis Khan ( talk) 19:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- This entire section is simply copied from the articles on the Pinarii and the Potitii. It should be rewritten to summarize the parts that are actually relevant to the novel. P Aculeius ( talk) 23:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
has anybody read this book? any suggestions on the introduction part? ( Rachelskit ( talk) 21:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC))
This section is only an analysis of the historical background of the pinarii and potii. I think two things need to be done (preferably by someone who has read the book...): 1. Rename this section and make it clear in its first sentence that it is an analysis of the historical background of the pinarii and potii.
2. Create a new section where knowledegable readers may describe/comment historical accuracies/inaccuracies of the book; poltical, cultural or otherwise. -- Djingis Khan ( talk) 19:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- This entire section is simply copied from the articles on the Pinarii and the Potitii. It should be rewritten to summarize the parts that are actually relevant to the novel. P Aculeius ( talk) 23:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)