This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Would a sortable grid make more sense for this list? Columns could include Team Name, City, State, Region, Associations, Year founded... a grid would make it easy to find all of your data quickly and easily.
Captain jim1 (
talk)
17:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I think that would be great, but it would be a lot of work to reference all that information. If you've got the time and drive, then go for it!
Warofdreamstalk14:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
By what criteria are the current page's regions decided? At what point does a state stop being midwestern and start being western? It seems to me that the list would make a LOT more sense if it went by state/territory than by arbitrary regions. I agree with Captain jim1 that a sortable list would be better. One difficulty with associations is that at least one of them (MADE) doesn't publish a list of its membership. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TimBRoy (
talk •
contribs)
02:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Would a sortable grid make more sense for this list? Columns could include Team Name, City, State, Region, Associations, Year founded... a grid would make it easy to find all of your data quickly and easily.
Captain jim1 (
talk)
17:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I think that would be great, but it would be a lot of work to reference all that information. If you've got the time and drive, then go for it!
Warofdreamstalk14:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
By what criteria are the current page's regions decided? At what point does a state stop being midwestern and start being western? It seems to me that the list would make a LOT more sense if it went by state/territory than by arbitrary regions. I agree with Captain jim1 that a sortable list would be better. One difficulty with associations is that at least one of them (MADE) doesn't publish a list of its membership. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TimBRoy (
talk •
contribs)
02:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
