This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Eminem Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eminem, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eminem on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EminemWikipedia:WikiProject EminemTemplate:WikiProject EminemEminem articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles Hip hop Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Although not a single, it was still a popular track and had a music video. More importantly, it charted regardlessly. Does this qualify for a page? - Disco dude rock ( talk) 22:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Since this was released as a legitimate single, so should it be put in chronology with the rest? - Disco dude rock ( talk) 20:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC) reply

• So, Aardwolf68, your suggestion is that I should add a source in order to reinstate information that you want in the article? That's not how it works; you have to add the source yourself (and if you reinstate the info with no changes, you will violate WP:3RR). Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 18:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • All you have to do is link the lyrics, it’s not just something I want, it’s been apart of the article for a while Aardwolf68 ( talk) 18:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply
    • Erpert, he's continuously adding fake unsourced information. His talk page shows that he's been doing this for a while. And he's not quitting -- Mr. Crabx ( talk) 10:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply
      • Don't listen to him, he's a sock of Morce Library and targeting me specficially. Aardwolf68 ( talk) 20:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply
        • I struck the sock's comment. But my argument still stands. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 16:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC) reply