This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Fisheries and Fishing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Although the COI is a problem, the "Controversy" section doesn't belong in this article as worded. It's sourced to two web pages, the second of which is just a page of search results, so I'll only consider the Chicago Tribune article. That one does not say that Martin was "criticized heavily." It doesn't even say there was a controversy. Given the BLP issue, if this gets re-added, it should only say what the source says. Kendall-K1 ( talk) 02:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC) reply