![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the debate was move to Rogaining. — Nightst a llion (?) 12:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC) The '(sport)' was for disambiguation with the pharmaceutical Rogaine, but is now unnecessary. jonon 08:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Incorrect spelling from the entry on the WP:RM page. Freakytoe 05:58, 11 October 2005
Be bold and move cases like this yourself. Except I have done this one for you. -- Henrygb 21:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
After finding a rather pathetic and lackluster history here on the wiki and then finding a substantial and well refenced version of the sport elsewhere, I brought over much of the history to add to the Historical section of the page, overwriting the sparse paragraph history. There is an external link with a much more in depth history, but I felt the added information was most relevant to the development of the sport on a worldwide level, without adding other countries histories. Anyone else have input on how much history is appropriate? I'd just love to see this get past start article status. -- Bendavis97140 23:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
"The source site does not assert notability." What does that mean? -- Una Smith 03:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Orienteering has begun; please stop by. -- Una Smith ( talk) 19:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I do not think minimal team of 2 is always required. I run rogaines alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.214.97.255 ( talk) 04:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
The sources about the involvement of the Surrey-Thomas Rover Crew in rogaining are now longer working and that articles is being proposed for merging. That Rover Crew is certainly notable if it was heavily involved in the creation of rogaining, but it needs good sources. Does anyone have such sources? They are needed at Surrey-Thomas Rover Crew and here. -- Bduke (Discussion) 20:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the debate was move to Rogaining. — Nightst a llion (?) 12:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC) The '(sport)' was for disambiguation with the pharmaceutical Rogaine, but is now unnecessary. jonon 08:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Incorrect spelling from the entry on the WP:RM page. Freakytoe 05:58, 11 October 2005
Be bold and move cases like this yourself. Except I have done this one for you. -- Henrygb 21:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
After finding a rather pathetic and lackluster history here on the wiki and then finding a substantial and well refenced version of the sport elsewhere, I brought over much of the history to add to the Historical section of the page, overwriting the sparse paragraph history. There is an external link with a much more in depth history, but I felt the added information was most relevant to the development of the sport on a worldwide level, without adding other countries histories. Anyone else have input on how much history is appropriate? I'd just love to see this get past start article status. -- Bendavis97140 23:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
"The source site does not assert notability." What does that mean? -- Una Smith 03:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Orienteering has begun; please stop by. -- Una Smith ( talk) 19:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I do not think minimal team of 2 is always required. I run rogaines alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.214.97.255 ( talk) 04:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
The sources about the involvement of the Surrey-Thomas Rover Crew in rogaining are now longer working and that articles is being proposed for merging. That Rover Crew is certainly notable if it was heavily involved in the creation of rogaining, but it needs good sources. Does anyone have such sources? They are needed at Surrey-Thomas Rover Crew and here. -- Bduke (Discussion) 20:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)