Rodrigo (musician) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 2, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that, in 2000, Argentinian singer
Rodrigo sold out 13 consecutive shows at the
Luna Park arena to promote his quadruple-platinum album A 2000? | ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on June 24, 2019. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: EricEnfermero ( talk · contribs) 05:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I will take on this GA review. After a quick read, it looks to me like the product of a lot of hard work. In the next few days I will go through it more carefully and post some initial comments. Thanks to the nominator for your dedication so far. EricEnfermero Howdy! 05:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Su rutina de fin de semana incluía entre ocho y diez recitales por noche; tocaba 20 minutos en un boliche y salía disparado hacia el siguiente cambalache de asedio femenino, custodias rigurosas y camarines bien provistos. Una noche tocó en cuatro provincias: Corrientes, Salta, Santiago del Estero y Tucumán. Sólo tomaba cerveza helada, en cantidades industriales, que le daba valor para convertir el escenario en un ring de boxeo, como a él le gustaba. Se alimentaba con la energía asfixiante de miles de fans, y si no alcanzaba con eso, dosis de suero líquido recetado para niños oxigenaban sus neuronas para que pudiesen dar el golpe de KO final.
-- Rod840 ( talk) 16:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I will make some minor copyedits to the article. Once we address the above feedback, I'll re-evaluate one more time. I'm placing this nomination on hold for one week. Thanks for your work so far. EricEnfermero Howdy! 08:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
As requested, here is more information on the referencing problems mentioned above. Taken individually, these might not prevent promotion to GA, but in general the referencing just needs to be tightened up a little. Examples:
I had a couple of other concerns, but I ultimately found the information in the cited sources. One last question concerns the mention of saline solution. Saline and other routine intravenous fluids are not typically substances of abuse. I'm not following the significance of using small amounts of sterile salt water.
Good work so far! We're almost there. EricEnfermero Howdy! 19:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing the last bit of feedback. I ran through again and made some copyedits. I did remove the mention of the saline, because I think it distracts from the main point. One final question: On the image of Rodrigo as a child, it says that the image is in the public domain in Argentina. While it does appear to be more than 25 years old, I don't see the evidence that it was published anywhere >20 years ago. If we can clarify this, I think we can promote this to GA. Any remaining issues are probably beyond the scope of GA. EricEnfermero Howdy! 05:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Reviewer and nominator made significant edits to grammar per review feedback. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Nominator clarified sourcing in some areas per review feedback. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Spot checks of references reveal no outstanding issues. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | One image removed from article due to concern regarding public domain rationale. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Promoting to GA. |
Thanks to the nominator for a great read and for working diligently to address the GA review feedback. EricEnfermero Howdy! 07:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I have done a small copyedit to the article, but I think it needs a major trimming; much of the information in the earlier paragraphs is merely repeated later on - one of them needs to go or it makes a dull read. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 15:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Rodrigo (musician) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 2, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that, in 2000, Argentinian singer
Rodrigo sold out 13 consecutive shows at the
Luna Park arena to promote his quadruple-platinum album A 2000? | ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on June 24, 2019. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: EricEnfermero ( talk · contribs) 05:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
I will take on this GA review. After a quick read, it looks to me like the product of a lot of hard work. In the next few days I will go through it more carefully and post some initial comments. Thanks to the nominator for your dedication so far. EricEnfermero Howdy! 05:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Su rutina de fin de semana incluía entre ocho y diez recitales por noche; tocaba 20 minutos en un boliche y salía disparado hacia el siguiente cambalache de asedio femenino, custodias rigurosas y camarines bien provistos. Una noche tocó en cuatro provincias: Corrientes, Salta, Santiago del Estero y Tucumán. Sólo tomaba cerveza helada, en cantidades industriales, que le daba valor para convertir el escenario en un ring de boxeo, como a él le gustaba. Se alimentaba con la energía asfixiante de miles de fans, y si no alcanzaba con eso, dosis de suero líquido recetado para niños oxigenaban sus neuronas para que pudiesen dar el golpe de KO final.
-- Rod840 ( talk) 16:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I will make some minor copyedits to the article. Once we address the above feedback, I'll re-evaluate one more time. I'm placing this nomination on hold for one week. Thanks for your work so far. EricEnfermero Howdy! 08:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
As requested, here is more information on the referencing problems mentioned above. Taken individually, these might not prevent promotion to GA, but in general the referencing just needs to be tightened up a little. Examples:
I had a couple of other concerns, but I ultimately found the information in the cited sources. One last question concerns the mention of saline solution. Saline and other routine intravenous fluids are not typically substances of abuse. I'm not following the significance of using small amounts of sterile salt water.
Good work so far! We're almost there. EricEnfermero Howdy! 19:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing the last bit of feedback. I ran through again and made some copyedits. I did remove the mention of the saline, because I think it distracts from the main point. One final question: On the image of Rodrigo as a child, it says that the image is in the public domain in Argentina. While it does appear to be more than 25 years old, I don't see the evidence that it was published anywhere >20 years ago. If we can clarify this, I think we can promote this to GA. Any remaining issues are probably beyond the scope of GA. EricEnfermero Howdy! 05:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Reviewer and nominator made significant edits to grammar per review feedback. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Nominator clarified sourcing in some areas per review feedback. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Spot checks of references reveal no outstanding issues. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | One image removed from article due to concern regarding public domain rationale. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Promoting to GA. |
Thanks to the nominator for a great read and for working diligently to address the GA review feedback. EricEnfermero Howdy! 07:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I have done a small copyedit to the article, but I think it needs a major trimming; much of the information in the earlier paragraphs is merely repeated later on - one of them needs to go or it makes a dull read. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 15:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)