This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / Spanish / Early Modern This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Spanish military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Spain This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm going to eliminate the rapier reference if no one objects, since the rapier is a civilian weapon for unarmored combat, not a military weapon for use in war. -- Wilhelm Ritter 15:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi Ritter, I went by this page. I don't think it is necessary to eliminate the rapier reference, since contempories at the time were not very choisy or precise about how they name weapons. It would be useful if there are primary texts for rodelero references, such as THE PRINCE or earlier histories. -Chin

Good grief. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.177.113 ( talk) 13:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC) reply

See that edit button? If something offends you, you can change it with that. 98.182.33.64 ( talk) 06:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hmph. This seems to be more of a commercial sales site than information. Will remove link. 209.89.219.182 ( talk) 19:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC) reply