![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi all
I have moved this from "Industrial robotic end effector" to "Robot end effector" and have also created a redirect page "Robotic end effector" which comes here.
The reasoning is that the topic is not merely limited to Industrial robots and not to fully robotic systems.
thanks... Chaosdruid ( talk)
This does not make much sense to me... why does the required force increase when a finger is added? I think it should be the other way round. Same with the friction coefficient. A high coefficient will decrease the force needed. Am I wrong? Kalectro ( talk) 01:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there,
Question: Is it "end effector" or "end-effector"? I think both ways are used in literature, but which is the correct one?
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urshof ( talk • contribs) 08:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi all
I have moved this from "Industrial robotic end effector" to "Robot end effector" and have also created a redirect page "Robotic end effector" which comes here.
The reasoning is that the topic is not merely limited to Industrial robots and not to fully robotic systems.
thanks... Chaosdruid ( talk)
This does not make much sense to me... why does the required force increase when a finger is added? I think it should be the other way round. Same with the friction coefficient. A high coefficient will decrease the force needed. Am I wrong? Kalectro ( talk) 01:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there,
Question: Is it "end effector" or "end-effector"? I think both ways are used in literature, but which is the correct one?
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urshof ( talk • contribs) 08:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)