GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 14:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I've had a quick read of the article and I consider that it is at or about GA-level. It seems to be well referenced and comprehensive. On the basis of this, I'm now going to do a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. The review will be against the requirements of WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.145.86 ( talk) 02:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
...Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 21:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 13:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting and eminently readable article on this opera.
I'm delighted to be able to award this article GA-status.
Pyrotec (
talk)
13:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 14:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I've had a quick read of the article and I consider that it is at or about GA-level. It seems to be well referenced and comprehensive. On the basis of this, I'm now going to do a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. The review will be against the requirements of WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.145.86 ( talk) 02:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
...Stopping for now. To be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 21:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 13:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting and eminently readable article on this opera.
I'm delighted to be able to award this article GA-status.
Pyrotec (
talk)
13:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)