![]() | Robert Parker Coffin Bridge has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Robert Parker Coffin Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
12:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by HueSatLum ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done yet.
Overall:
Waiting on QPQ and a replacement source. The hook is great and present in the article and source.
Sounder
Bruce
06:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The hook should refer to established facts that are unlikely to change. It's true that if it's "more than 40" today, it'll always be "more than 40", but the closer this is tied to a specific number, the less it complies with the spirit of that rule. I think we're also close to "D6 ... unresolved edit-warring".
@
Bruxton: I searched Google News and a news database for "long grove" bridge
between September 1, 2022 and now. These are all the results I found that specify the number of strikes:
Extended content
|
---|
List:
|
While they are not perfectly consistent, they all support the sentence in the article that there have been at least 40 bridge strikes as of September 2022
(since the one figure under 40 says "at least"). It's possible my search missed some -- are there other sources you're aware of that contradict the number 40? ~
hue
sat
lum
03:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I think 40 is a number repeated in many sources. I see that a few other sources claim less than 40. I will approve 40 based on the fact that it is repeated in more sources. I think that the hook saying dozens is also reasonable. Good article!
Lightburst (
talk) 02:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Lightburst (
talk)
02:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs) 19:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
The local oral history is that there was a wooden structure that served as a bridge over Buffalo Creek prior to 1906, but no records or photographs are known to exist that document this.. I clarified to mean that this refers to historic records, and I restructured the automobile sentence into one that reads better and is more distinct. ~ hue sat lum 21:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
... which was renamed for Coffin in the early 1980s.~ hue sat lum 21:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
@ HueSatLum: This looks like it should pass after some minor cleanup work. I'll put it on hold to give you time to do that work and respond. Please ping me when you thing it's ready for another look. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
All issues addressed and fixed, passing for GA. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Cool article and topic. One of the most important facts on the topic can be derived/assumed but is never said. That most or all of the hits are cases where the vehicle was too tall for the bridge. An idea would be to add that. I'd do it but probably should come from a source. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 21:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Robert Parker Coffin Bridge has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Robert Parker Coffin Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 February 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk)
12:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by HueSatLum ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done yet.
Overall:
Waiting on QPQ and a replacement source. The hook is great and present in the article and source.
Sounder
Bruce
06:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The hook should refer to established facts that are unlikely to change. It's true that if it's "more than 40" today, it'll always be "more than 40", but the closer this is tied to a specific number, the less it complies with the spirit of that rule. I think we're also close to "D6 ... unresolved edit-warring".
@
Bruxton: I searched Google News and a news database for "long grove" bridge
between September 1, 2022 and now. These are all the results I found that specify the number of strikes:
Extended content
|
---|
List:
|
While they are not perfectly consistent, they all support the sentence in the article that there have been at least 40 bridge strikes as of September 2022
(since the one figure under 40 says "at least"). It's possible my search missed some -- are there other sources you're aware of that contradict the number 40? ~
hue
sat
lum
03:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I think 40 is a number repeated in many sources. I see that a few other sources claim less than 40. I will approve 40 based on the fact that it is repeated in more sources. I think that the hook saying dozens is also reasonable. Good article!
Lightburst (
talk) 02:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Lightburst (
talk)
02:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: David Eppstein ( talk · contribs) 19:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
The local oral history is that there was a wooden structure that served as a bridge over Buffalo Creek prior to 1906, but no records or photographs are known to exist that document this.. I clarified to mean that this refers to historic records, and I restructured the automobile sentence into one that reads better and is more distinct. ~ hue sat lum 21:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
... which was renamed for Coffin in the early 1980s.~ hue sat lum 21:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
@ HueSatLum: This looks like it should pass after some minor cleanup work. I'll put it on hold to give you time to do that work and respond. Please ping me when you thing it's ready for another look. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
All issues addressed and fixed, passing for GA. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Cool article and topic. One of the most important facts on the topic can be derived/assumed but is never said. That most or all of the hits are cases where the vehicle was too tall for the bridge. An idea would be to add that. I'd do it but probably should come from a source. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 21:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)