From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Hawkeye7 (
talk ·
contribs )
22:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Picking this one up. Review to follow.
Hawkeye7
(discuss)
22:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Lead
"4th Australian Base Area" should be "4th Base Sub Area"
Could we have his service number in the infobox? It was QX23797
Remove the hard-coded image size from the infobox
World War I
I don't see the need to put "A" Squadron in quotation marks.
typo: "the trenches douth"
"spurline" should be "spur". Could be linked to
ridge ?
Interwar period
World War II
"4th Base Sub-Area" should be "4th Base Sub Area"
United Nations service and death
Duplicate links
Queensland, colonel, second-in-command
References
Londrey (2021) is giving me a CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) Delete the ref from the template, as it is already the default.
All looks very good. Just some minor points.
Hawkeye7
(discuss)
22:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
All done, thanks
Hawkeye . BTW, warm congrats on your election as lead coord!
Peacemaker67 (
click to talk to me )
03:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
Thank you. I've never been the lead coordinator before.
Hawkeye7
(discuss)
04:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
C. It contains
no original research :
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Great article.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.