Robert McLachlan (cinematographer) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 12, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Robert McLachlan (cinematographer) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 September 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 02:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I will review this article.
I will do my best to get to at least the various parts of the review of the article within a time period of Seven Days... —
Cirt (
talk)
02:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Next, on to rest of review. — Cirt ( talk) 02:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
This article's Good Article nomination has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of October 11, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:
External links = does he have his own official website?
#NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. Within 7 days, the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed by then, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Pass as GA. My thanks to GA Nominator Grapple X for being so polite and responsive during the GA Review! Please consider reviewing two articles for every one you nominate, — Cirt ( talk) 09:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Robert McLachlan (cinematographer) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 12, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Robert McLachlan (cinematographer) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 September 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 02:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I will review this article.
I will do my best to get to at least the various parts of the review of the article within a time period of Seven Days... —
Cirt (
talk)
02:15, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Next, on to rest of review. — Cirt ( talk) 02:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
This article's Good Article nomination has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of October 11, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:
External links = does he have his own official website?
#NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. Within 7 days, the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed by then, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt ( talk) 04:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Pass as GA. My thanks to GA Nominator Grapple X for being so polite and responsive during the GA Review! Please consider reviewing two articles for every one you nominate, — Cirt ( talk) 09:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)