![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Academy officers normally wear the officer rank insignia which existed in the Canadian Army prior to 1968 ("pips" and crowns). Shouldn't this be changed in light of the Canadian Army returning to pips and crowns? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4800:54:8DD8:7508:4AC2:D2E ( talk) 03:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
I know there has been a lot of abuse by ex-students trashing the Academy, but there has been some public criticism of the Academy. Even though this goes back 15 years, it is still relevant and should be presented in unbiased form as part of the article. The follow are some of the areas that should be reviewed for content.
I know some of these issues can be blown out of proportion (or not). Airtap, I know you object to these at all, but they are part of the history of the academy. Could you help present this in a way that is accurate and unbiased?
Blaineboy ( talk) 22:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Academy officers normally wear the officer rank insignia which existed in the Canadian Army prior to 1968 ("pips" and crowns). Shouldn't this be changed in light of the Canadian Army returning to pips and crowns? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4800:54:8DD8:7508:4AC2:D2E ( talk) 03:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
I know there has been a lot of abuse by ex-students trashing the Academy, but there has been some public criticism of the Academy. Even though this goes back 15 years, it is still relevant and should be presented in unbiased form as part of the article. The follow are some of the areas that should be reviewed for content.
I know some of these issues can be blown out of proportion (or not). Airtap, I know you object to these at all, but they are part of the history of the academy. Could you help present this in a way that is accurate and unbiased?
Blaineboy ( talk) 22:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)