This article was nominated for deletion on 3/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to ABC news: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/23/2170552.htm the Federal Government has granted permanent residency to Mr Jovicic. Winterelf ( talk) 21:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate the articel was discussed at an AfD and kept. I appreciate there are lots of news references. But I still do not feel he is notable. What has changed as a result of his situation? -- Matilda talk 07:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The article was discussed and the decision was to keep, end of story really. He is not notable, but what happened to him was. He was one of several notable immigration cases which occurred under Senator Vanstone's watch and embarrassed the government (Howard's). It may be (purely a conjecture) that together they got Senator Vanstone removed from her job, and they might have had some influence on the election Howard subsequently lost. Aarghdvaark ( talk) 09:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I didn't take part in the discussion about deletion as I had contributed to the article and thought it best to let others decide Aarghdvaark ( talk) 11:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC). However, having had the decision "keep", I think it is inappropriate to try and undo that decision. I thought some of the key points in the discussion were:
is this the same robert(neb) jovicic that the australian securities investment commission keeps getting complaints about?.....livivng on the gold coast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.195.88 ( talk) 05:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Robert Jovicic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.abc.net.au/sydney/stories/s1590439.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.abc.net.au/sydney/stories/s1590439.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 3/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to ABC news: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/23/2170552.htm the Federal Government has granted permanent residency to Mr Jovicic. Winterelf ( talk) 21:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate the articel was discussed at an AfD and kept. I appreciate there are lots of news references. But I still do not feel he is notable. What has changed as a result of his situation? -- Matilda talk 07:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The article was discussed and the decision was to keep, end of story really. He is not notable, but what happened to him was. He was one of several notable immigration cases which occurred under Senator Vanstone's watch and embarrassed the government (Howard's). It may be (purely a conjecture) that together they got Senator Vanstone removed from her job, and they might have had some influence on the election Howard subsequently lost. Aarghdvaark ( talk) 09:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I didn't take part in the discussion about deletion as I had contributed to the article and thought it best to let others decide Aarghdvaark ( talk) 11:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC). However, having had the decision "keep", I think it is inappropriate to try and undo that decision. I thought some of the key points in the discussion were:
is this the same robert(neb) jovicic that the australian securities investment commission keeps getting complaints about?.....livivng on the gold coast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.195.88 ( talk) 05:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Robert Jovicic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.abc.net.au/sydney/stories/s1590439.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.abc.net.au/sydney/stories/s1590439.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)