![]() | Robert Furman has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 23, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Robert Furman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,027 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 00:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Will aim to review in the next few days. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- No dab links, dup links, or EL issues.
Prose/structure/detail/referencing -- Minor copyedit but otherwise seems fine.
Supporting materials -- Image license looks good (US Govt).
Short and sweet, can't see any reason not to pass as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Robert Furman has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 23, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Robert Furman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 6 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,027 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 00:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Will aim to review in the next few days. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- No dab links, dup links, or EL issues.
Prose/structure/detail/referencing -- Minor copyedit but otherwise seems fine.
Supporting materials -- Image license looks good (US Govt).
Short and sweet, can't see any reason not to pass as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)