![]() | Roads and freeways in metropolitan Phoenix was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The I-11 exists and is open, it's not a future interstate anymore. 23:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:B4C0:38:9883:BB69:B864:7779 ( talk)
Or lack thereof. Can anybody upload some and add them to the article? Looks very plain right now. Rko202 ( talk) 03:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 04:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
*1a) beelines for downtown? Not sure if that's formal...
On hold This article needs a bit of cleanup before GA and especially for ACR and FA. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 18:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Passing. I'm not completely confident in the structure, but this is an unconventional article in general (as it's not on a highway like the vast majority of USRD articles). You may need to reevaluate it again at ACR or FAC. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 03:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Should this instead be at Phoenix metropolitan area freeways? That makes more sense to me. Karanacs ( talk) 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
A more proper name would be "Highways in metropolitan Phoenix" as it does not discuss city streets at all, but only numbered highways (whether or not they are limited access highways, which some folks call "freeways"). And isn't, for example, "Arizona State Route 143" redundant? Surely it should just be "Arizona Route 143" since, quite obviously, Arizona is a State. Wlindley ( talk) 05:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
I made two edits here that updated the formatting of the references used. I'll detail why I did what I did here.
A suggestion going forward would be to convert all of the ISO-style dates into regular format dates. That style is a relic of the days when the templates used date autoformatting on access dates, but date autoformatting is pretty much deprecated now. I only used the style for consistency, but honestly there's no reason not to use normal date formatting in the references. Rand McNally, CNN and KJZZ can be linked if desired, since others are linked on first mention. The rest of the information for Ref 23 should be found to create a full citation using {{ cite report}}. Imzadi 1979 → 07:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This 2008 listing contains significant uncited information, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b). It has also not been adequately updated since its promotion, as shown by events in 2015 being referred to with the future tense. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 04:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Roads and freeways in metropolitan Phoenix was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The I-11 exists and is open, it's not a future interstate anymore. 23:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:B4C0:38:9883:BB69:B864:7779 ( talk)
Or lack thereof. Can anybody upload some and add them to the article? Looks very plain right now. Rko202 ( talk) 03:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Admrb♉ltz ( t • c • log) 04:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
*1a) beelines for downtown? Not sure if that's formal...
On hold This article needs a bit of cleanup before GA and especially for ACR and FA. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 18:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Passing. I'm not completely confident in the structure, but this is an unconventional article in general (as it's not on a highway like the vast majority of USRD articles). You may need to reevaluate it again at ACR or FAC. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 03:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Should this instead be at Phoenix metropolitan area freeways? That makes more sense to me. Karanacs ( talk) 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
A more proper name would be "Highways in metropolitan Phoenix" as it does not discuss city streets at all, but only numbered highways (whether or not they are limited access highways, which some folks call "freeways"). And isn't, for example, "Arizona State Route 143" redundant? Surely it should just be "Arizona Route 143" since, quite obviously, Arizona is a State. Wlindley ( talk) 05:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
I made two edits here that updated the formatting of the references used. I'll detail why I did what I did here.
A suggestion going forward would be to convert all of the ISO-style dates into regular format dates. That style is a relic of the days when the templates used date autoformatting on access dates, but date autoformatting is pretty much deprecated now. I only used the style for consistency, but honestly there's no reason not to use normal date formatting in the references. Rand McNally, CNN and KJZZ can be linked if desired, since others are linked on first mention. The rest of the information for Ref 23 should be found to create a full citation using {{ cite report}}. Imzadi 1979 → 07:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This 2008 listing contains significant uncited information, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b). It has also not been adequately updated since its promotion, as shown by events in 2015 being referred to with the future tense. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 04:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)