This article is about a topic whose name is originally rendered in the
Bengali script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Bengali script. For more information, see: MOS:FOREIGN. |
A fact from Rizwanur Rahman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Im not exactly sure where to put this as ive never edited/commented on wikipedia. The article calls his death as a suicide. I just read an article titled "Chargesheet filed in Rizwanur murder case" http://www.indianexpress.com/news/microchip-technology-to-invest-65-mn-in-india/364791/ and it clearly shows murder. Perhaps someone can take note and correct the main article. 58.8.16.79 ( talk) 03:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
As a Muslim I find this all quite odd. How on earth can a Muslim man marry a Hindu woman? How could the marriage be valid? India sure is a strange country if they allow this sort of marriage to take place at all! It amazes me that it was her family that was upset about the marriage and not the other way around. It's sad that Indian Muslims would see this kind of marriage as acceptable and defend this guy. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.72.91.241 (
talk) 19:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
"WHAT FUTURE THIS BANGLADESHI ILLEGAL MAN HAD......???? HE LIVED IN TILJALA ......... ISLAMIC HELL HOLE IN CENTRAL KOLKATTA.... HE HAD NO GOOD JOB .......EVERYONE IS NOWADAYS A GRAPIC DESIGNER..... WHAT FUTURE HE HAD WITH A MUSLIM GIRL ......??? WHAT BETTER THAN MARRYING A RICH MARWARI GIRL IN NAME OF ROMANCE ....?? HE BETRAYED THE TRUST REPOSED BY PARENTS IN THE GURU PARAMPARA.... ...GOOD RIDDANCE AND MAY HE ROT IN HELL" - by anonymous. IP 123.201.90.31 at 09:54, 31 October 2007
Rizwanur was from a Hindi speaking family. He did not sport a long beard or wore a traditional hat to express his religious beliefs in public. He was educated from a Catholic school and a Catholic college. What the police officers did to him was not for his religious faith, but because of the power & financial status of the other party. and what the police did was illegal according to the laws of a country which boasts that its not ruled by Hindu Talibans. One eminent writer said: "This would not have happened if the girl married ShahRukh or Aamir Khan.
If the teacher tries to exploit a student, the student will report about the teacher's misconduct to the police, or in this particular case, her powerful and wealthy parents would have sufficed. She should not have gone to the Marriage Registrar.
Romance between teachers and their adult students are prehistoric and not limited to multimedia, web design or some educational institution. An adult woman is not the property of her parents so that "HE BETRAYED THE TRUST REPOSED BY PARENTS IN THE GURU PARAMPARA" by marrying her. According to your arguement, the woman betrayed the trust set on herself by her parents. Sub40Hz 09:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Recent developments have been added. CBI investigations are continuing, and thus some of the views expressed are better stated as allegations rather than as facts. -- ISKapoor 19:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Good job! But there are lots of rumors being actively spread by the police. You can guess why! Kolkata Police is run by IPS officers, and so is CBI... there is access, there can be friendship, and some more! Please use good sources, and keep a daily track of whats being said by reputed news companies (at least they are too rich to be bribed easily) like Times of India, NDTV or Ananda Bazar. Thanks! Sub40Hz 18:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
User:Worldlitto has inserted a link to http://rizwanurtragedy.blogspot.com/ at the top of the article which states:
Our conclusion.. It's pretty simple: Rizwanur was murdered. And the murderer.. None other than: Ashok Todi.
He has also inserted related views.
The case is under investigation. The facts need to be reported without judging that it is a murder and who is the murderer. Let the investigation bring out the facts.
User:Sub40Hz has inserted:
Who are the experienced investigators? What is the source?
-- Vikramsingh 18:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Im-going-to-die-in-5-min-let-me-hear-her-once-Rizwanur-in-SMS-to-inlaws-no-one-heard/232212/ The bottom of this page will cite some info about the person from the Human Rights Commission. Also, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071025/asp/frontpage/story_8471549.asp Read the last line of this page. The rest I saw on a reliable TV channel and I will find pages that can be referred to. Sub40Hz 18:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Tha case has had significant political implications. Some information about political prespective has been adeed.-- ISKapoor 22:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Who married who? Its been said that Rahman married Priyanka, and it was unfaithful of a teacher to marry his student. Unlike arranged marriage, where consent of the woman is often not taken, love marriages take place with consent from BOTH PARTIES. So it was equally "unfaithful" for Priyanka to marry her teacher. Sub40Hz 05:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The legal communique from Priyanka is almost redundant for this article, except for adding a bit drama, it is not concerned to Rahman's death in any way. Let it be there for now, but it should be very brief and more neutral. Sub40Hz ( talk) 17:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The article states:
The SMS has not been proven to be false. The the use of term rumors is inappropriate.
It has not been shown that the SMS were fake, as the article presumes.
-- ISKapoor ( talk) 20:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The press and the blogs appears to have judged the case and has declared Priyanka's father guilty. There has been alot of political pressure on the police and the government.
Times of India writes:"Even the blogosphere erupted — Rizwanur Rahman, a graphic designer from the city's Muslim shanties, was hailed as a 'real hero' and a 'martyr in love'. Singers dusted off predictable Joan Baez and Paul Robeson songs in his memory; others wrote poems." [4]
However I would urge the Wikipedians to be neutral.-- ISKapoor ( talk) 20:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
PLease note that CBI appears to have ruled out murder [5]:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Rizwanur Rahman. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Rizwanur Rahman. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
This article is about a topic whose name is originally rendered in the
Bengali script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Bengali script. For more information, see: MOS:FOREIGN. |
A fact from Rizwanur Rahman appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Im not exactly sure where to put this as ive never edited/commented on wikipedia. The article calls his death as a suicide. I just read an article titled "Chargesheet filed in Rizwanur murder case" http://www.indianexpress.com/news/microchip-technology-to-invest-65-mn-in-india/364791/ and it clearly shows murder. Perhaps someone can take note and correct the main article. 58.8.16.79 ( talk) 03:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
As a Muslim I find this all quite odd. How on earth can a Muslim man marry a Hindu woman? How could the marriage be valid? India sure is a strange country if they allow this sort of marriage to take place at all! It amazes me that it was her family that was upset about the marriage and not the other way around. It's sad that Indian Muslims would see this kind of marriage as acceptable and defend this guy. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.72.91.241 (
talk) 19:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
"WHAT FUTURE THIS BANGLADESHI ILLEGAL MAN HAD......???? HE LIVED IN TILJALA ......... ISLAMIC HELL HOLE IN CENTRAL KOLKATTA.... HE HAD NO GOOD JOB .......EVERYONE IS NOWADAYS A GRAPIC DESIGNER..... WHAT FUTURE HE HAD WITH A MUSLIM GIRL ......??? WHAT BETTER THAN MARRYING A RICH MARWARI GIRL IN NAME OF ROMANCE ....?? HE BETRAYED THE TRUST REPOSED BY PARENTS IN THE GURU PARAMPARA.... ...GOOD RIDDANCE AND MAY HE ROT IN HELL" - by anonymous. IP 123.201.90.31 at 09:54, 31 October 2007
Rizwanur was from a Hindi speaking family. He did not sport a long beard or wore a traditional hat to express his religious beliefs in public. He was educated from a Catholic school and a Catholic college. What the police officers did to him was not for his religious faith, but because of the power & financial status of the other party. and what the police did was illegal according to the laws of a country which boasts that its not ruled by Hindu Talibans. One eminent writer said: "This would not have happened if the girl married ShahRukh or Aamir Khan.
If the teacher tries to exploit a student, the student will report about the teacher's misconduct to the police, or in this particular case, her powerful and wealthy parents would have sufficed. She should not have gone to the Marriage Registrar.
Romance between teachers and their adult students are prehistoric and not limited to multimedia, web design or some educational institution. An adult woman is not the property of her parents so that "HE BETRAYED THE TRUST REPOSED BY PARENTS IN THE GURU PARAMPARA" by marrying her. According to your arguement, the woman betrayed the trust set on herself by her parents. Sub40Hz 09:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Recent developments have been added. CBI investigations are continuing, and thus some of the views expressed are better stated as allegations rather than as facts. -- ISKapoor 19:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Good job! But there are lots of rumors being actively spread by the police. You can guess why! Kolkata Police is run by IPS officers, and so is CBI... there is access, there can be friendship, and some more! Please use good sources, and keep a daily track of whats being said by reputed news companies (at least they are too rich to be bribed easily) like Times of India, NDTV or Ananda Bazar. Thanks! Sub40Hz 18:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
User:Worldlitto has inserted a link to http://rizwanurtragedy.blogspot.com/ at the top of the article which states:
Our conclusion.. It's pretty simple: Rizwanur was murdered. And the murderer.. None other than: Ashok Todi.
He has also inserted related views.
The case is under investigation. The facts need to be reported without judging that it is a murder and who is the murderer. Let the investigation bring out the facts.
User:Sub40Hz has inserted:
Who are the experienced investigators? What is the source?
-- Vikramsingh 18:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Im-going-to-die-in-5-min-let-me-hear-her-once-Rizwanur-in-SMS-to-inlaws-no-one-heard/232212/ The bottom of this page will cite some info about the person from the Human Rights Commission. Also, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071025/asp/frontpage/story_8471549.asp Read the last line of this page. The rest I saw on a reliable TV channel and I will find pages that can be referred to. Sub40Hz 18:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Tha case has had significant political implications. Some information about political prespective has been adeed.-- ISKapoor 22:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Who married who? Its been said that Rahman married Priyanka, and it was unfaithful of a teacher to marry his student. Unlike arranged marriage, where consent of the woman is often not taken, love marriages take place with consent from BOTH PARTIES. So it was equally "unfaithful" for Priyanka to marry her teacher. Sub40Hz 05:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The legal communique from Priyanka is almost redundant for this article, except for adding a bit drama, it is not concerned to Rahman's death in any way. Let it be there for now, but it should be very brief and more neutral. Sub40Hz ( talk) 17:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The article states:
The SMS has not been proven to be false. The the use of term rumors is inappropriate.
It has not been shown that the SMS were fake, as the article presumes.
-- ISKapoor ( talk) 20:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The press and the blogs appears to have judged the case and has declared Priyanka's father guilty. There has been alot of political pressure on the police and the government.
Times of India writes:"Even the blogosphere erupted — Rizwanur Rahman, a graphic designer from the city's Muslim shanties, was hailed as a 'real hero' and a 'martyr in love'. Singers dusted off predictable Joan Baez and Paul Robeson songs in his memory; others wrote poems." [4]
However I would urge the Wikipedians to be neutral.-- ISKapoor ( talk) 20:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
PLease note that CBI appears to have ruled out murder [5]:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Rizwanur Rahman. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Rizwanur Rahman. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)