Riverwind was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 10 March 2020. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As with Goldmoon, I will be doing a major edit here. So, if you suddenly find a lot of information put together, missing stuff or broken wikilinks, don't worry, it was my fault :-) -- ReyBrujo 03:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
ReyBrujo - Regarding some of the links in this article that refer to characters not actually listed on List of Dragonlance characters; I'm kind of new at editing and would appreciate some input-might it be best to note this issue in that article's talk page, or will these links be weeded out entirely from this article? Specifically, Riverwind's children don't have actual references in Wikipedia that I can find. -- Ipso-De-Facto 09:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I judged this article on 7 criteria:
Congratulations, it passes! The prose could be better, but it's certainly not bad, and I feel that that and references are the biggest differences between GAC and FAC anyway. Thank you for writing another good fantasy article! -- PresN 16:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Since this article has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability, I have requested a review of its Good Article status at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Riverwind/1.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 13:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
At the time of writing, no reliable secondary sources providing evidence of notability for the fictional character Riverwind are cited in this article. The article has many primary references (citations from the author & publishers), but none that are reliable seconary sources. I request that the notability template be restored to this article.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 10:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Riverwind was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This page was proposed for deletion by TTN ( talk · contribs) on 10 March 2020. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As with Goldmoon, I will be doing a major edit here. So, if you suddenly find a lot of information put together, missing stuff or broken wikilinks, don't worry, it was my fault :-) -- ReyBrujo 03:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
ReyBrujo - Regarding some of the links in this article that refer to characters not actually listed on List of Dragonlance characters; I'm kind of new at editing and would appreciate some input-might it be best to note this issue in that article's talk page, or will these links be weeded out entirely from this article? Specifically, Riverwind's children don't have actual references in Wikipedia that I can find. -- Ipso-De-Facto 09:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I judged this article on 7 criteria:
Congratulations, it passes! The prose could be better, but it's certainly not bad, and I feel that that and references are the biggest differences between GAC and FAC anyway. Thank you for writing another good fantasy article! -- PresN 16:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Since this article has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability, I have requested a review of its Good Article status at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Riverwind/1.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 13:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
At the time of writing, no reliable secondary sources providing evidence of notability for the fictional character Riverwind are cited in this article. The article has many primary references (citations from the author & publishers), but none that are reliable seconary sources. I request that the notability template be restored to this article.-- Gavin Collins ( talk) 10:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)