River Weaver has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
River Weaver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:River Weaver map. |
DDStretch (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Rated as B-class for UK waterways project. Bob1960evens ( talk) 15:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the following, because the web reference does not link to anything that mentions Frodsham, and I cannot find any info on the RWNS site or the web to support it. Nor does it appear on the wayback archive. Please feel free to add the information back in if you can find a suitable reference.
Bob1960evens ( talk) 17:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I have extended to route diagram to include the aqueducts of the Middlewich Branch, the Shropshire Union main line and the Llangollen canal. Bob1960evens ( talk) 18:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on River Weaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
The text states "more than 50 miles (80 km) long"; the infobox 96 km (60 mi). Neither appears directly sourced. (I tried to request a source for the infobox figure but it just breaks the infobox coding.) Espresso Addict ( talk) 05:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
River Weaver has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
River Weaver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:River Weaver map. |
DDStretch (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Rated as B-class for UK waterways project. Bob1960evens ( talk) 15:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I have removed the following, because the web reference does not link to anything that mentions Frodsham, and I cannot find any info on the RWNS site or the web to support it. Nor does it appear on the wayback archive. Please feel free to add the information back in if you can find a suitable reference.
Bob1960evens ( talk) 17:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I have extended to route diagram to include the aqueducts of the Middlewich Branch, the Shropshire Union main line and the Llangollen canal. Bob1960evens ( talk) 18:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on River Weaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
The text states "more than 50 miles (80 km) long"; the infobox 96 km (60 mi). Neither appears directly sourced. (I tried to request a source for the infobox figure but it just breaks the infobox coding.) Espresso Addict ( talk) 05:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)