This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Project management. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Edited in full. Confusing section marked ( Risk_breakdown_structure#Templates_for_Creating_a_Risk_Breakdown_Structure) In this place, in particular, it seems that the content is copied or paraphrased from an instructional textbook. Paulmnguyen ( talk) 01:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC) reply

In the section on Qualitative analysis, the two sentences beginning "At no point should the project manager or risk manager . . . " seem both to disrupt the flow of the article and to be more normative than descriptive. I'd suggest that these be moved to an advice article. SenexQuondam ( talk) 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply