The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: BigLordFlash ( talk · contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- The prose is clear and concise, nothing to point. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- I fixed all the minor mistakes. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- It has a list of all references. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- All sentences have reliable sources. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- C. It contains
no original research:
- No original research. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- No copyright violations ( Earwig) BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- It addresses all the main aspects. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It's totally neutral. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars or content dispute. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- No copyright issues. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- All images are relevant and have suitable captions. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: BigLordFlash ( talk · contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- The prose is clear and concise, nothing to point. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- I fixed all the minor mistakes. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- It has a list of all references. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- All sentences have reliable sources. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- C. It contains
no original research:
- No original research. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- No copyright violations ( Earwig) BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- It addresses all the main aspects. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It's totally neutral. BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars or content dispute. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- No copyright issues. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- All images are relevant and have suitable captions. BigLordFlash talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlash talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)