![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Riksdag = "Diet of the Realm"? I'm from sweden and in modern swedish i would say that it means "Day of the country" Or is this some kind of really old swedish that I don't understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.231.137 ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 21 November 2005
I agree with you, "Diet of the Realm" seems strange as a translation. But on the other hand, the English word Diet, in the meaning of a legislative or administrative assembly, could historically be translated into Swedish as församling or riksdag. So Diet is actually a translation of riksdag in itself. The word realm, in the meaning of a domain ruled by a king or queen, might be translated into Swedish as kungarike, so maybe that is what "of the Realm" is referring to. But as far as I understand, riksdag comes from a word for country, rike, and the word for day, dag. So the word for word translation should be something like: the country’s day. And the historic meaning of the word riksdag: a gathering of representatives of the country for deliberation and decision-making concerning the country’s affairs. For more info about the word riksdag in Swedish, see SAOB.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Burman ( talk • contribs) 15 December 2005
Riksdag is going back longer, to the middle-ages where all lords (adelsmän) and the king meet to establish national and foreign affaires. This meeting were held when needed, so it could be several years in between. Like the Arboga Riksdag och Västerrås Riksdag in 1527. I think it should be added that the word is going back, before a parliament was established. The german Reichtag, where Tag means day, but also in medieval german could mean meating. And since the swedish word "dag" is related to "Tag" (but in german the 'd' became a 't' through a Lautveschiebung) so it would probably mean the same. I hope this can be to some help or shed some light on the issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.69.243.98 ( talk) 18:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The representation in the Riksdag has now been syncronized with the last election results. http://www.val.se/val/val2006/valnatt/R/rike/roster.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.243.30.228 ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 19 September 2006
Earlier sweden had 350 seats in the riksdag, an even number - as opposed an uneven number, like in many other countries. After an election sweden faced a situation where both the left and the right had exactly 175 seats in the parliment. During this period of rule - the riksdag had to resolve a limited number of issues by drawing lots. After that, they changed the constitution and now we have 349 seats. Maybe this is something worth mentioning in the article? -- Mailerdaemon 17:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
see Members of the Swedish Parliament 2006-2010. -- Soman 15:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
The name riksdag is not exclusive to the Swedish parliament. The page should therefor be moved, and the article
riksdag should be made into a disembiguation page, with links to both the
parliament of Sweden and the
parliament of Finland as well as other uses of the word.
E.G.
16:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Riksdag to Parliament of Sweden as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 09:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Someone is screwing with the coat of arms, flag and the three crowns. They are distorted and should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.229.185.111 ( talk) 21:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
There have just been a new election to the Swedish parliament the site needs to be updated
I have this genereal info but will somebody please help me expand it.
× | Parti | Mandater | Procent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rød block | 157 | 45,0% | |
2 | Blå blok | 172 | 49,3% | |
3 | Sverigedemokraterne | 20 | 5,7% |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rphb ( talk • contribs) 20 September 2010
Any particular reason why the 2006 election results are posted in their entirety while the 2010 results are tucked away on their own page without any mention of the actual outcome? Or is it just a case of "no one has fixed it yet"? - Alltat ( talk) 06:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move to Riksdag. There's solid consensus for using "Riksdag" in the title. Taken together, forms including "Riksdag" appear to be comparably common in English sources as "Parliament of Sweden", and there's no pressing policy or style reason for preferring the latter. Of the suggested options, simply "Riksdag" seems to have the best support, and this subject seems to be the most common use of the term. The dab page will be moved to Riksdag (disambiguation). Cúchullain t/ c 14:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Parliament of Sweden → Riksdag of Sweden – The title of this article should be renamed as Riksdag of Sweden, for the simple reason that the institution refers to itself, in its English language website as the Riksdag ( http://www.riksdagen.se/en/) and also in the English translations of the fundamental laws published on that website. We cannot use Riksdag since that one is already used for the term in general. Other articles on enwp calls it Riksdag in their titles Riksdag of the Estates and History of the Riksdag. And there is no policy stating that legislatures must be named "Parliament of X" either; to the contrary see Sejm, Folketing, Storting and Bundestag. Parliament of Sweden should, of course, remain as a redirect, but it should no longer be kept as the article name since that name it has no offical sanction.--Relisted Apteva ( talk) 02:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC) RicJac ( talk) 20:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
In my view, two acceptable options: First, Riksdag as the only word in the title (like Reichstag, and second the current Parliament of Sweden, basically creating a logical English title. I don't at all support Riksdag in Sweden. Ego White Tray ( talk) 02:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh, silly me, yes it is, if the page move and the explanation for it is anything to go by. God forbid someone closing a move discussion and effecting a move should mention anything about WP policy or the evidence presented in their closing note, as opposed to simply counting votes. N-HH talk/ edits 14:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
As an aside, in cleaning up incoming links after the move, I ran through the articles linking directly to "Riksdag" to see if there were any that intended another use, but I haven't found any. In fact, it's much more common for articles to use an easter egg link along the lines of [[Parliament of Sweden|Riksdag]]. This is probably further evidence that this is the right name for the article.-- Cúchullain t/ c 15:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
The parliament of Sweden does not have a name. In Swedish, it is just called riksdagen, which just means "the parliament" and is not even written with a capital r. It should therefor not be listed as "Riksdagen" or "the Riksdag" in Wikipedia. To do so is a missconception and missunderstanding of the Swedish constitution. The same term is also used for the Finnish parliament, as far as I know. Railie May ( talk) 15:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was not moved. Plenty of evidence below that Riksdag is a well used English term to refer to the Swedish parliament. -- regentspark ( comment) 18:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Riksdag → Parliament of Sweden – The parliament of Sweden does not have a name. In Swedish, it is just called riksdagen, which just means "the parliament" and is not even written with a capital r. This is how it is written in the Swedish constitution (regeringsformen)! It should therefor not be listed as "Riksdag", "Riksdagen" or "the Riksdag" in Wikipedia. To do so is a missconception and missunderstanding of the Swedish constitution. The same term is also used for the Finnish parliament, as far as I know, so to use the name "Riksdag" for only the Swedish parliament wthout any other distinction is wrong anyhow. This move was also done before, in 2007. Railie May ( talk) 16:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
“ | Riksdag, n.
Pronunciation: Brit. /ˈrɪksdɑːɡ/ , /ˈrɪksdaɡ/ , /ˈriːksdɑːɡ/ , /ˈriːksdaɡ/ , U.S. /ˈrɪksˌdɑɡ/ Etymology: < Swedish Riksdag (first half of the 16th cent.) < the genitive of rike riche n. + dag diet, conference (spec. use of dag day n.), after German Reichstag Reichstag n. Compare Rigsdag n. and Reichstag n. O.E.D. Suppl. (1982) gives only the non-naturalized pronunciation (ri·ksdag) /ˈriksdaɡ/ . (The name of) the Swedish Parliament or national legislative assembly of Sweden; (also) the building in which the Parliament meets.
|
” |
For those still in doubt, here is a handy little chart:
Organization | Riksdag | Swedish parliament | Parliament of Sweden | URLs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Highbeam Compiled news stories |
585 | 885 | 13 | www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=Riksdag http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Swedish+Parliament%22 http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Parliament+of+Sweden%22 |
CNN | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Riksdag site:edition.cnn.com "Swedish parliament" site:edition.cnn.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:edition.cnn.com |
Fox News | 7 | 9 | 1 |
Riksdag site:www.foxnews.com "Swedish parliament" site:www.foxnews.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.foxnews.com |
BBC | 7 | 70 | 0 |
Riksdag site:www.bbc.co.uk "Swedish parliament" site:www.bbc.co.uk "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.bbc.co.uk |
New York Times | 146 | 285 | 0 |
Riksdag site:www.nytimes.com "Swedish parliament" site:www.nytimes.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.nytimes.com |
I've reverted this recent move as there was no discussion and obviously no consensus for that name. I've also established move protection as the article has been the subject of move wars from various editors unhappy with the current name. The article should not be moved without another RM establishing consensus for a different name.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This edit is poor article writing, as it implies the article is about the "English exonym for" the assembly, instead of being about the assembly itself. This section already covers the name. I'll add a note from the OED about it; hopefully that will settle the matter.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know Swedish. I freely admit this. But one of the names for it in Swedish, is "Riksdag". I'm not sure why we should call it an exonym then? Perhaps suggest a move to "Sveriges riksdag" or something, but we do literally have the title there in the proper language and script. When referring to it, English speakers will call it the "riksdag" which isn't far off from what the native Swedish speakers call it. It's not like "Nihon" versus "Japan", or "China" versus "Guangzhou", which are clearly romanizations of languages that we don't even approach. Perhaps you could explain why we need to call it an exonym? Then I think more people would understand and possibly agree. Jsharpminor ( talk) 01:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus is clearly against the proposed move. Number 5 7 16:06, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
. Riksdag → Parliament of Sweden – This Riksdag "name" of the Swedish parliament seems awkward in English, it doesn't fit. Most other parliaments in Category:Parliaments by country have names in English, including the other national parliament which is named riksdag in one of its own languages, namely the Parliament of Finland. The parliament of Sweden doesn't have a name, in the Swedish constitution (regeringsformen) the word "riksdag" is written with a lower case r [3]. Bandy boy ( talk) 13:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Riksdag. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Riksdag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
If the current government is a minority, which parties are supporting it? If all the other parties were really in opposition, the government would already have fallen as a result of losing a budget or non-confidence vote. Therefore, some parties should be displayed as 'support parties' as in other countries with minority governments (e.g. New Zealand and Denmark). Thorbecke2012 ( talk) 13:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Riksdag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
All the votes has not been counted. The preliminary mandates just recently changed. They can still change again. And the new parliament has not gathered yet. The old parliament still exist. – GeMet [ gemet| ʇǝɯǝƃ] 17:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
And, as always, nothing is decided until the new government is appointed. As news reports pointed out today S+MP+C+L together don't have a majority and the Left party might vote no to Löfven as PM. If all other parties do the same Löfven won't be PM, at least not now. Sjö ( talk) 15:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
When looking att the picture in the article than is said to show the former room of the Second chamber something is wrong. I think this is a picture taken in the room of the former First chamber. When googeling pictures the artwork in the roof is not the one in the Second chamber. -- Leffe00 ( talk) 14:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
In the infobox, there is something that seems to be wrong. That is that Nina Lundström (the abstaining Liberal) is placed in Confidence and supply. I believe that this is wrong. She voted to abstain because she feared a weak goverment dependent on the Sweden Democrats. This doesn't mean that she supports Lövfen or his government, like Amineh Kakabaveh did. Therefore the infobox should say that all Liberals should be in the opposition, with a footnote explaining why one Liberal MP abstained.-- Der under Smurf ( talk) 09:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
@ BastianMAT, Edcba109, KitHutch, and FellowMellow: Mp left the coalition but only because the right-wing budget passed. There MUST be a new motion because the original coalition break apart. Braganza ( talk) 16:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
@Braganza Okay, just letting you know Magdallena Andersson has resigned after the Green party’s decision. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/talmansrundor So again, the speaker of the house (for the fourth time) gets to nominate a new prime minister and we will have a new prime minister vote again. The leader of the opposition might get the first chance this time, considering that his party/alliance won the budget vote and MP pulled out their support, but thats totally up to the speaker. What we do know is that the goverment that has not even taken place yet, has fallen apart. I don’t mind what we do but yeah, another political crisis. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/talmansrundor BastianMAT ( talk) 17:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
I guess yeah. Let’s have them as supply for now and make it clear that the current government is an interim one (led by Stefan). BastianMAT ( talk) 17:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Braganza: Let’s keep the Centre, Left, and Greens in supply mode, until further notice. Let’s not put the government link as Andersson’s government, but the current interim of Löfven. Greens will be the key to Andersson getting support or another Social Democrat-PM choice (due to Andersson's resignation), which it has said it will do. [5] - FellowMellow ( talk) 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Riksdag = "Diet of the Realm"? I'm from sweden and in modern swedish i would say that it means "Day of the country" Or is this some kind of really old swedish that I don't understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.231.137 ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 21 November 2005
I agree with you, "Diet of the Realm" seems strange as a translation. But on the other hand, the English word Diet, in the meaning of a legislative or administrative assembly, could historically be translated into Swedish as församling or riksdag. So Diet is actually a translation of riksdag in itself. The word realm, in the meaning of a domain ruled by a king or queen, might be translated into Swedish as kungarike, so maybe that is what "of the Realm" is referring to. But as far as I understand, riksdag comes from a word for country, rike, and the word for day, dag. So the word for word translation should be something like: the country’s day. And the historic meaning of the word riksdag: a gathering of representatives of the country for deliberation and decision-making concerning the country’s affairs. For more info about the word riksdag in Swedish, see SAOB.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Burman ( talk • contribs) 15 December 2005
Riksdag is going back longer, to the middle-ages where all lords (adelsmän) and the king meet to establish national and foreign affaires. This meeting were held when needed, so it could be several years in between. Like the Arboga Riksdag och Västerrås Riksdag in 1527. I think it should be added that the word is going back, before a parliament was established. The german Reichtag, where Tag means day, but also in medieval german could mean meating. And since the swedish word "dag" is related to "Tag" (but in german the 'd' became a 't' through a Lautveschiebung) so it would probably mean the same. I hope this can be to some help or shed some light on the issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.69.243.98 ( talk) 18:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The representation in the Riksdag has now been syncronized with the last election results. http://www.val.se/val/val2006/valnatt/R/rike/roster.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.243.30.228 ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 19 September 2006
Earlier sweden had 350 seats in the riksdag, an even number - as opposed an uneven number, like in many other countries. After an election sweden faced a situation where both the left and the right had exactly 175 seats in the parliment. During this period of rule - the riksdag had to resolve a limited number of issues by drawing lots. After that, they changed the constitution and now we have 349 seats. Maybe this is something worth mentioning in the article? -- Mailerdaemon 17:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
see Members of the Swedish Parliament 2006-2010. -- Soman 15:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
The name riksdag is not exclusive to the Swedish parliament. The page should therefor be moved, and the article
riksdag should be made into a disembiguation page, with links to both the
parliament of Sweden and the
parliament of Finland as well as other uses of the word.
E.G.
16:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Riksdag to Parliament of Sweden as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 09:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Someone is screwing with the coat of arms, flag and the three crowns. They are distorted and should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.229.185.111 ( talk) 21:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
There have just been a new election to the Swedish parliament the site needs to be updated
I have this genereal info but will somebody please help me expand it.
× | Parti | Mandater | Procent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rød block | 157 | 45,0% | |
2 | Blå blok | 172 | 49,3% | |
3 | Sverigedemokraterne | 20 | 5,7% |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rphb ( talk • contribs) 20 September 2010
Any particular reason why the 2006 election results are posted in their entirety while the 2010 results are tucked away on their own page without any mention of the actual outcome? Or is it just a case of "no one has fixed it yet"? - Alltat ( talk) 06:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move to Riksdag. There's solid consensus for using "Riksdag" in the title. Taken together, forms including "Riksdag" appear to be comparably common in English sources as "Parliament of Sweden", and there's no pressing policy or style reason for preferring the latter. Of the suggested options, simply "Riksdag" seems to have the best support, and this subject seems to be the most common use of the term. The dab page will be moved to Riksdag (disambiguation). Cúchullain t/ c 14:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Parliament of Sweden → Riksdag of Sweden – The title of this article should be renamed as Riksdag of Sweden, for the simple reason that the institution refers to itself, in its English language website as the Riksdag ( http://www.riksdagen.se/en/) and also in the English translations of the fundamental laws published on that website. We cannot use Riksdag since that one is already used for the term in general. Other articles on enwp calls it Riksdag in their titles Riksdag of the Estates and History of the Riksdag. And there is no policy stating that legislatures must be named "Parliament of X" either; to the contrary see Sejm, Folketing, Storting and Bundestag. Parliament of Sweden should, of course, remain as a redirect, but it should no longer be kept as the article name since that name it has no offical sanction.--Relisted Apteva ( talk) 02:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC) RicJac ( talk) 20:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
In my view, two acceptable options: First, Riksdag as the only word in the title (like Reichstag, and second the current Parliament of Sweden, basically creating a logical English title. I don't at all support Riksdag in Sweden. Ego White Tray ( talk) 02:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh, silly me, yes it is, if the page move and the explanation for it is anything to go by. God forbid someone closing a move discussion and effecting a move should mention anything about WP policy or the evidence presented in their closing note, as opposed to simply counting votes. N-HH talk/ edits 14:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
As an aside, in cleaning up incoming links after the move, I ran through the articles linking directly to "Riksdag" to see if there were any that intended another use, but I haven't found any. In fact, it's much more common for articles to use an easter egg link along the lines of [[Parliament of Sweden|Riksdag]]. This is probably further evidence that this is the right name for the article.-- Cúchullain t/ c 15:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
The parliament of Sweden does not have a name. In Swedish, it is just called riksdagen, which just means "the parliament" and is not even written with a capital r. It should therefor not be listed as "Riksdagen" or "the Riksdag" in Wikipedia. To do so is a missconception and missunderstanding of the Swedish constitution. The same term is also used for the Finnish parliament, as far as I know. Railie May ( talk) 15:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was not moved. Plenty of evidence below that Riksdag is a well used English term to refer to the Swedish parliament. -- regentspark ( comment) 18:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Riksdag → Parliament of Sweden – The parliament of Sweden does not have a name. In Swedish, it is just called riksdagen, which just means "the parliament" and is not even written with a capital r. This is how it is written in the Swedish constitution (regeringsformen)! It should therefor not be listed as "Riksdag", "Riksdagen" or "the Riksdag" in Wikipedia. To do so is a missconception and missunderstanding of the Swedish constitution. The same term is also used for the Finnish parliament, as far as I know, so to use the name "Riksdag" for only the Swedish parliament wthout any other distinction is wrong anyhow. This move was also done before, in 2007. Railie May ( talk) 16:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
“ | Riksdag, n.
Pronunciation: Brit. /ˈrɪksdɑːɡ/ , /ˈrɪksdaɡ/ , /ˈriːksdɑːɡ/ , /ˈriːksdaɡ/ , U.S. /ˈrɪksˌdɑɡ/ Etymology: < Swedish Riksdag (first half of the 16th cent.) < the genitive of rike riche n. + dag diet, conference (spec. use of dag day n.), after German Reichstag Reichstag n. Compare Rigsdag n. and Reichstag n. O.E.D. Suppl. (1982) gives only the non-naturalized pronunciation (ri·ksdag) /ˈriksdaɡ/ . (The name of) the Swedish Parliament or national legislative assembly of Sweden; (also) the building in which the Parliament meets.
|
” |
For those still in doubt, here is a handy little chart:
Organization | Riksdag | Swedish parliament | Parliament of Sweden | URLs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Highbeam Compiled news stories |
585 | 885 | 13 | www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=Riksdag http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Swedish+Parliament%22 http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Parliament+of+Sweden%22 |
CNN | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Riksdag site:edition.cnn.com "Swedish parliament" site:edition.cnn.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:edition.cnn.com |
Fox News | 7 | 9 | 1 |
Riksdag site:www.foxnews.com "Swedish parliament" site:www.foxnews.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.foxnews.com |
BBC | 7 | 70 | 0 |
Riksdag site:www.bbc.co.uk "Swedish parliament" site:www.bbc.co.uk "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.bbc.co.uk |
New York Times | 146 | 285 | 0 |
Riksdag site:www.nytimes.com "Swedish parliament" site:www.nytimes.com "Parliament of Sweden" site:www.nytimes.com |
I've reverted this recent move as there was no discussion and obviously no consensus for that name. I've also established move protection as the article has been the subject of move wars from various editors unhappy with the current name. The article should not be moved without another RM establishing consensus for a different name.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This edit is poor article writing, as it implies the article is about the "English exonym for" the assembly, instead of being about the assembly itself. This section already covers the name. I'll add a note from the OED about it; hopefully that will settle the matter.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know Swedish. I freely admit this. But one of the names for it in Swedish, is "Riksdag". I'm not sure why we should call it an exonym then? Perhaps suggest a move to "Sveriges riksdag" or something, but we do literally have the title there in the proper language and script. When referring to it, English speakers will call it the "riksdag" which isn't far off from what the native Swedish speakers call it. It's not like "Nihon" versus "Japan", or "China" versus "Guangzhou", which are clearly romanizations of languages that we don't even approach. Perhaps you could explain why we need to call it an exonym? Then I think more people would understand and possibly agree. Jsharpminor ( talk) 01:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus is clearly against the proposed move. Number 5 7 16:06, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
. Riksdag → Parliament of Sweden – This Riksdag "name" of the Swedish parliament seems awkward in English, it doesn't fit. Most other parliaments in Category:Parliaments by country have names in English, including the other national parliament which is named riksdag in one of its own languages, namely the Parliament of Finland. The parliament of Sweden doesn't have a name, in the Swedish constitution (regeringsformen) the word "riksdag" is written with a lower case r [3]. Bandy boy ( talk) 13:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Riksdag. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Riksdag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
If the current government is a minority, which parties are supporting it? If all the other parties were really in opposition, the government would already have fallen as a result of losing a budget or non-confidence vote. Therefore, some parties should be displayed as 'support parties' as in other countries with minority governments (e.g. New Zealand and Denmark). Thorbecke2012 ( talk) 13:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Riksdag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
All the votes has not been counted. The preliminary mandates just recently changed. They can still change again. And the new parliament has not gathered yet. The old parliament still exist. – GeMet [ gemet| ʇǝɯǝƃ] 17:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
And, as always, nothing is decided until the new government is appointed. As news reports pointed out today S+MP+C+L together don't have a majority and the Left party might vote no to Löfven as PM. If all other parties do the same Löfven won't be PM, at least not now. Sjö ( talk) 15:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
When looking att the picture in the article than is said to show the former room of the Second chamber something is wrong. I think this is a picture taken in the room of the former First chamber. When googeling pictures the artwork in the roof is not the one in the Second chamber. -- Leffe00 ( talk) 14:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
In the infobox, there is something that seems to be wrong. That is that Nina Lundström (the abstaining Liberal) is placed in Confidence and supply. I believe that this is wrong. She voted to abstain because she feared a weak goverment dependent on the Sweden Democrats. This doesn't mean that she supports Lövfen or his government, like Amineh Kakabaveh did. Therefore the infobox should say that all Liberals should be in the opposition, with a footnote explaining why one Liberal MP abstained.-- Der under Smurf ( talk) 09:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
@ BastianMAT, Edcba109, KitHutch, and FellowMellow: Mp left the coalition but only because the right-wing budget passed. There MUST be a new motion because the original coalition break apart. Braganza ( talk) 16:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
@Braganza Okay, just letting you know Magdallena Andersson has resigned after the Green party’s decision. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/talmansrundor So again, the speaker of the house (for the fourth time) gets to nominate a new prime minister and we will have a new prime minister vote again. The leader of the opposition might get the first chance this time, considering that his party/alliance won the budget vote and MP pulled out their support, but thats totally up to the speaker. What we do know is that the goverment that has not even taken place yet, has fallen apart. I don’t mind what we do but yeah, another political crisis. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/talmansrundor BastianMAT ( talk) 17:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
I guess yeah. Let’s have them as supply for now and make it clear that the current government is an interim one (led by Stefan). BastianMAT ( talk) 17:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Braganza: Let’s keep the Centre, Left, and Greens in supply mode, until further notice. Let’s not put the government link as Andersson’s government, but the current interim of Löfven. Greens will be the key to Andersson getting support or another Social Democrat-PM choice (due to Andersson's resignation), which it has said it will do. [5] - FellowMellow ( talk) 21:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)