This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Snooker Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Snooker, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of snooker on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SnookerWikipedia:WikiProject SnookerTemplate:WikiProject SnookerSnooker articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Latvia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think the stat section is unnessecary, as the winners and runnerups can be clearly seen from the Winners section, unless there are other statistics about the tournament.-- Ui56k ( talk) 08:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I agree, I think we should hide this section for now until more perceptible number of editions of the event has been played. Vinitsky14 ( talk) 15:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC) reply

• Leave as is. Third tournament will be played soon, enough statistics. 95.135.111.186 ( talk) 15:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply