![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
See Wikipedia:Verifiability. You need only read the nutshell, specifically that uncited statements "may be challenged or removed by any editor." Wikipedia articles must be substantiated by reliable sources. — Centrx→ talk • 17:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
The article survived the AfD, with an overwhelming majority of participants indicating that the article should be kept. The clear majority consensus is that the article is notable, and contains all the necessary references from reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy claims of notability. Immediately after the AfD was completed, Primarysources and Notability tags were added to the article. As the AfD for the article was closed as a Keep, that should be prima facie evidence that notability has been met and sources have been provided. The article that survived AfD had 14 sources, only one of which was from the school itself. Everyone of the 13 other sources is from a reliable and verifiable secondary source, by definition independent and unconnected with the school itself. I find it hard to understand what the issues are, but no explanation whatsoever has been provided to explain why we should be revisiting issues settled minutes before. As indicated in the AfD, concerns were raised that the article does not meet the notability standards required by WP:SCHOOL. The article makes several explicit claims of notability for the school, in full compliance with WP:SCHOOL. Unless there are legitimate issues being raised -- and I unfortunately must question whether these tags were applied in good faith -- I would sincerely hope that the user inquestion will accept the majority consensus and move on. Alansohn 03:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Those aren't third-party sources. Everything except the sports section is just links to the schools website. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Notability. — Centrx→ talk • 04:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Can we please only list Alumni in this section with actual credibility and a developed career rather than people who have graduated less than a few years and may be at the start of a good career but have gained no public notoriety. Let's be resonable especially compared to the others listed in this section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Incepta4 ( talk • contribs) 15:05, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
Agreed. Editing to that effect now. Justinthebull ( talk) 18:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
How about this? Make a no-bullshit entry about the school. When I went there (graduated in 2005) Sub-par teachers were in proliferation and horrific children attend aforementioned school, and the entire graduating class of 2005 is noted for a high "oops pregnancy" rate and low success rate in personal as well as professional life. Let it also be noted how cliquish the place is, and the high rate of teens who are scarred for life, having attended the place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rams2005 ( talk • contribs) 08:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the academics section, please include that Ridgewood's Odyssey of the Mind team won both the Ranatra Fusca creativity award and the OMER award at the regional competition, taking home the most awards of any high school in attendance. Trongsin ( talk) 07:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ridgewood High School (Florida). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
See Wikipedia:Verifiability. You need only read the nutshell, specifically that uncited statements "may be challenged or removed by any editor." Wikipedia articles must be substantiated by reliable sources. — Centrx→ talk • 17:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
The article survived the AfD, with an overwhelming majority of participants indicating that the article should be kept. The clear majority consensus is that the article is notable, and contains all the necessary references from reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy claims of notability. Immediately after the AfD was completed, Primarysources and Notability tags were added to the article. As the AfD for the article was closed as a Keep, that should be prima facie evidence that notability has been met and sources have been provided. The article that survived AfD had 14 sources, only one of which was from the school itself. Everyone of the 13 other sources is from a reliable and verifiable secondary source, by definition independent and unconnected with the school itself. I find it hard to understand what the issues are, but no explanation whatsoever has been provided to explain why we should be revisiting issues settled minutes before. As indicated in the AfD, concerns were raised that the article does not meet the notability standards required by WP:SCHOOL. The article makes several explicit claims of notability for the school, in full compliance with WP:SCHOOL. Unless there are legitimate issues being raised -- and I unfortunately must question whether these tags were applied in good faith -- I would sincerely hope that the user inquestion will accept the majority consensus and move on. Alansohn 03:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Those aren't third-party sources. Everything except the sports section is just links to the schools website. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Notability. — Centrx→ talk • 04:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Can we please only list Alumni in this section with actual credibility and a developed career rather than people who have graduated less than a few years and may be at the start of a good career but have gained no public notoriety. Let's be resonable especially compared to the others listed in this section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Incepta4 ( talk • contribs) 15:05, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
Agreed. Editing to that effect now. Justinthebull ( talk) 18:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
How about this? Make a no-bullshit entry about the school. When I went there (graduated in 2005) Sub-par teachers were in proliferation and horrific children attend aforementioned school, and the entire graduating class of 2005 is noted for a high "oops pregnancy" rate and low success rate in personal as well as professional life. Let it also be noted how cliquish the place is, and the high rate of teens who are scarred for life, having attended the place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rams2005 ( talk • contribs) 08:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the academics section, please include that Ridgewood's Odyssey of the Mind team won both the Ranatra Fusca creativity award and the OMER award at the regional competition, taking home the most awards of any high school in attendance. Trongsin ( talk) 07:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ridgewood High School (Florida). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)